You and your country will become a slave to the Jews (you are already
I am not a slave to anyone. I have chosen not to be. It really is that simple. I am well aware of the actions of the Jews (or rather, those very few people that sit at the top of the rest of the Jewish people). Their actions have been behind everything. What YOU don't appreciate, and don't seem to want to even indulge as possible, is that the Catholic Church (and all other Abrahamic religions) were started by those same Jews, specifically to control the world. It is the actions of those same Jews that I am trying to help you see. The fuckery just goes back further than you realize.
In your attempts to shake slavery, you reject the one way out.
You are incorrect. I mean, you can believe that if you want, and that's fair, but your belief doesn't make it true. My investigation has shown me that I have chosen to live in slavery prior to a few years ago and my own personal revelation. This revelation occurred after I realized I had not previously investigated honestly, but rather with biases I didn't know I had. My original investigations into "reality" were based from a situation very similar to your current stance. Since that revelation I have chosen to not live in slavery.
The freedom I feel, that I experience, the recognition of my own agency and my responsibility for that agency is unbelievable in its power. Thus, your belief that I am a slave because I do not believe exactly the same as you believe is not warranted by how I feel. Am I delusional? Sure, maybe. Maybe the feeling of complete freedom that I have is totally delusional, but it is so incredibly empowering, idgaf.
Jesus knew what He was talking about.
I agree with this statement. However, if you haven't read all of the Gospels, including all of the ones left out of the Bible, I suggest you have no fucking clue what Jesus was really saying. The Jews (their agents) left out some really important things, and shoved in their Old Testament, on purpose, to completely screw with the belief systems, and drive a false Christian religion down the throats of those who would follow Jesus' teachings. They took a profundity, and brutalized it so that they could control society.
The evidence suggests that the same Jews that you seem to despise (again, a very small group of them at the top of the food chain) are the people that created your beliefs and your Church. They purposefully left out really important context to create that control system. That is what I was trying to show you.
You aren't going to listen to me
I have listened to everything you have said. Every word has been important to me. I can't possibly provide a reasonable response if I don't listen. I don't think you are on the right path simply because from what I have seen you have not looked in earnest at all of the evidence. Me not believing what you believe doesn't mean I haven't listened. Thinking that it does, I suggest, doesn't appreciate what it means to listen, and cogitate, and respond after listening.
I'm going to take His word over yours
Jesus has said nothing contradictory to what I am saying. On the contrary, his words completely corroborate mine. You just won't find all the important ones in "The Bible."
Spare me the word salads.
This suggests to me that you do not understood what it means to listen. I have spoken in earnest. When you are ready to listen in earnest, perhaps we can have a more meaningful conversation. I look forward to that day, if it ever comes.
What YOU don't appreciate, and don't seem to want to even indulge as possible, is that the Catholic Church (and all other Abrahamic religions) were started by those same Jews, specifically to control the world. It is the actions of those same Jews that I am trying to help you see. The fuckery just goes back further than you realize.
Ah the Adam Green argument.
He's a Jew. All revolutionary Jews denounce the Catholic faith.
I have never heard of Adam Green. I have never looked at his work. I came to this conclusion based on evidence that I have found during my investigation. Assuming that someone you don't like who says something you don't like is automatically wrong is a major flaw in any investigation. It isn't the source of the evidence you must question, but the evidence itself. You MUST dig into the evidence to even begin to approach the truth. You must go to the primary sources, or you haven't investigated anything.
ALL of the cases you are making of a "Jew v. Catholic" narrative are exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like. That is evidence for, not evidence against.
Just like in Governments, Wars, or propaganda of any sort, the way it works is, if there is something they don't want you to see, they say nothing about it at all. The Jews have controlled all press, all works of literature, since the time of Christ. If the Catholic Church (and Islam, and the Reformation religions) were not their contrivance, no one (or very few) would have ever heard them. They would have all gone the way of Gnosticism, or Zoroasterism, etc.
THOSE are the things they are really trying to keep you away from. Not that I am suggesting any of those things are true either, but Gnosticism especially uses all of the Gospels to tell it's story, not just the Gospels of the Bible. Some groups of Gnostics don't use any teachings by Paul. Paul is a quagmire, but there is evidence that suggests Paul may have been a Jewish double agent, designing specifically to lead Christians along the wrong path, a path away from the real teachings of Jesus.
You MUST read the originals, and understand the errors commonly employed in translations from the original, before you can understand the fuckery.
They couldn't stop the teachings of Jesus from being far reaching, but they could control what those beliefs were. That is the nature of Controlled Opposition. Start the agency of opposition if you know its coming, hijack it if someone else starts it first. In the case of the Church they kinda did both. The Opposition were the people who listened to Jesus. The Church was the formal system designed to rule all of those people, ensuring they all believed the same thing, not thinking for themselves, but thinking aligned with a specific goal. Thus they went from being the Opposition, to being Controlled Opposition through the creation and control of the formal Church and it's tenets.
Control the narrative, control the belief, control society, control the world.
And that is exactly what happened.
Muslim was created for the same purpose by the same people for the same reason, and then set in opposition to Christianity specifically because you must have an enemy if you want to rule through fear and hate.
You can't rule except by fear and hate. It doesn't work. People realize their own agency unless they are afraid and feel they need "help" from an external source. Thus through fear they are willing to give up liberty (self-agency) for security.
All enemies have been a contrivance by the same group (Nazi's, USSR, etc.) used for exactly this purpose.
Watch this before you bother writing me back.
I will watch it. I didn't watch it first because my response is to address your misunderstanding of what Controlled Opposition is. When you really dig in, you realize it is everywhere. The world has been run by Controlled Opposition for thousands of years. The only way to always win is to be both sides. The true "other side," is the side you never hear about, or the side that gets labeled as "crazy.".
My evidence suggests your Church, the box of your beliefs, was created by the Jews and Freemasonry (it's predecessor, but close enough)...
You've got the players right (sorta), but you can't look at the evidence itself. You refuse to look at the actual fuckery. You have no idea what evidence I'm even talking about. You won't even engage in earnest with the tiny pieces I gave you.
You suggesting that you know, a priori, what the evidence is and who created it is ludicrous beyond reason and sanity. If you can see at least that much, that your suppositions rule your reason, then maybe there can be some level of progression.
I am not a slave to anyone. I have chosen not to be. It really is that simple. I am well aware of the actions of the Jews (or rather, those very few people that sit at the top of the rest of the Jewish people). Their actions have been behind everything. What YOU don't appreciate, and don't seem to want to even indulge as possible, is that the Catholic Church (and all other Abrahamic religions) were started by those same Jews, specifically to control the world. It is the actions of those same Jews that I am trying to help you see. The fuckery just goes back further than you realize.
You are incorrect. I mean, you can believe that if you want, and that's fair, but your belief doesn't make it true. My investigation has shown me that I have chosen to live in slavery prior to a few years ago and my own personal revelation. This revelation occurred after I realized I had not previously investigated honestly, but rather with biases I didn't know I had. My original investigations into "reality" were based from a situation very similar to your current stance. Since that revelation I have chosen to not live in slavery.
The freedom I feel, that I experience, the recognition of my own agency and my responsibility for that agency is unbelievable in its power. Thus, your belief that I am a slave because I do not believe exactly the same as you believe is not warranted by how I feel. Am I delusional? Sure, maybe. Maybe the feeling of complete freedom that I have is totally delusional, but it is so incredibly empowering, idgaf.
I agree with this statement. However, if you haven't read all of the Gospels, including all of the ones left out of the Bible, I suggest you have no fucking clue what Jesus was really saying. The Jews (their agents) left out some really important things, and shoved in their Old Testament, on purpose, to completely screw with the belief systems, and drive a false Christian religion down the throats of those who would follow Jesus' teachings. They took a profundity, and brutalized it so that they could control society.
The evidence suggests that the same Jews that you seem to despise (again, a very small group of them at the top of the food chain) are the people that created your beliefs and your Church. They purposefully left out really important context to create that control system. That is what I was trying to show you.
I have listened to everything you have said. Every word has been important to me. I can't possibly provide a reasonable response if I don't listen. I don't think you are on the right path simply because from what I have seen you have not looked in earnest at all of the evidence. Me not believing what you believe doesn't mean I haven't listened. Thinking that it does, I suggest, doesn't appreciate what it means to listen, and cogitate, and respond after listening.
Jesus has said nothing contradictory to what I am saying. On the contrary, his words completely corroborate mine. You just won't find all the important ones in "The Bible."
This suggests to me that you do not understood what it means to listen. I have spoken in earnest. When you are ready to listen in earnest, perhaps we can have a more meaningful conversation. I look forward to that day, if it ever comes.
Besides that fantastic documentary by E Michael Jones, here is one more article for you to consider:
https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/dont-try-to-control-me
Ah the Adam Green argument.
He's a Jew. All revolutionary Jews denounce the Catholic faith.
https://biblehub.com/matthew/16-18.htm
The Catholic faith is not a Jewish trick. The Jews hate the Catholic church which is why they try at every turn to get people to stay away from it.
https://www.adl.org/sites/default/files/documents/assets/pdf/combating-hate/E-Michael-Jones.pdf
The Jewish FBI goes after the Catholic faith. The Freemasons, which are Jewish footsoldiers, hate the Catholic faith and swore to infiltrate it.
Put your pattern recognition on.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TLAU3D9vVXC3/
Watch this before you bother writing me back.
I have never heard of Adam Green. I have never looked at his work. I came to this conclusion based on evidence that I have found during my investigation. Assuming that someone you don't like who says something you don't like is automatically wrong is a major flaw in any investigation. It isn't the source of the evidence you must question, but the evidence itself. You MUST dig into the evidence to even begin to approach the truth. You must go to the primary sources, or you haven't investigated anything.
ALL of the cases you are making of a "Jew v. Catholic" narrative are exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like. That is evidence for, not evidence against.
Just like in Governments, Wars, or propaganda of any sort, the way it works is, if there is something they don't want you to see, they say nothing about it at all. The Jews have controlled all press, all works of literature, since the time of Christ. If the Catholic Church (and Islam, and the Reformation religions) were not their contrivance, no one (or very few) would have ever heard them. They would have all gone the way of Gnosticism, or Zoroasterism, etc.
THOSE are the things they are really trying to keep you away from. Not that I am suggesting any of those things are true either, but Gnosticism especially uses all of the Gospels to tell it's story, not just the Gospels of the Bible. Some groups of Gnostics don't use any teachings by Paul. Paul is a quagmire, but there is evidence that suggests Paul may have been a Jewish double agent, designing specifically to lead Christians along the wrong path, a path away from the real teachings of Jesus.
You MUST read the originals, and understand the errors commonly employed in translations from the original, before you can understand the fuckery.
They couldn't stop the teachings of Jesus from being far reaching, but they could control what those beliefs were. That is the nature of Controlled Opposition. Start the agency of opposition if you know its coming, hijack it if someone else starts it first. In the case of the Church they kinda did both. The Opposition were the people who listened to Jesus. The Church was the formal system designed to rule all of those people, ensuring they all believed the same thing, not thinking for themselves, but thinking aligned with a specific goal. Thus they went from being the Opposition, to being Controlled Opposition through the creation and control of the formal Church and it's tenets.
Control the narrative, control the belief, control society, control the world.
And that is exactly what happened.
Muslim was created for the same purpose by the same people for the same reason, and then set in opposition to Christianity specifically because you must have an enemy if you want to rule through fear and hate.
You can't rule except by fear and hate. It doesn't work. People realize their own agency unless they are afraid and feel they need "help" from an external source. Thus through fear they are willing to give up liberty (self-agency) for security.
All enemies have been a contrivance by the same group (Nazi's, USSR, etc.) used for exactly this purpose.
I will watch it. I didn't watch it first because my response is to address your misunderstanding of what Controlled Opposition is. When you really dig in, you realize it is everywhere. The world has been run by Controlled Opposition for thousands of years. The only way to always win is to be both sides. The true "other side," is the side you never hear about, or the side that gets labeled as "crazy.".
Evidence provided to you by Jews and Freemasonry, super.
My evidence suggests your Church, the box of your beliefs, was created by the Jews and Freemasonry (it's predecessor, but close enough)...
You've got the players right (sorta), but you can't look at the evidence itself. You refuse to look at the actual fuckery. You have no idea what evidence I'm even talking about. You won't even engage in earnest with the tiny pieces I gave you.
You suggesting that you know, a priori, what the evidence is and who created it is ludicrous beyond reason and sanity. If you can see at least that much, that your suppositions rule your reason, then maybe there can be some level of progression.