All of those are actual.scientific disciplines. One of the problems is that a lot of the so-called experts are so specialized, they only know a certain small subsection of those disciplines, then are asked by the media heads to explain things they have no idea about, which causes speculation, which then confuses the issue. Another problem is suckas like [Hussein] and others who say "the science is settled." That phrase alone is pseudoscientific in that science can NEVER be settled. It demands rigorous investigation in order to disprove any particular theory. Just because some theories haven't been disproven yet doesn't mean they won't be disproven in the future. Cases in point: flat Earth, an Earth-centric solar system, the way elementary schools have kids "model" the solar system, the speed of Sound being broken, aerial flight, deep sea submersibles, space flight, etc. That's why a true scientist will NEVER, EVER, EVER say any one theorem is fact. It goes against the scientific model of practicing science itself. A third problem would be how these virologists at NIH, NIAID, and CDC have "modeled" how "effective" these mRNA vaccines are and how many people they've "saved." The modeling is bunk to begin with because anyone can program the "models" with erroneous info to get any conclusion they want that "proves" their theory.

I suggest looking up evolutionary biologist Brett Weinstein and his DarkHorse podcasts. Spotify, Audacy, YT, Patreon, all carry them. He's also been on Joe Rogan's podcast as late as Jan discussing these very concepts of bunk science and how it affects our daily lives.