Why is this allowed? It is clear the $1 was a token, it seems a court would rule that only a token was required to leave. Double their money and send them $2. 😅Plus, who paid for any repairs or renovations? Local or organization? Who changed the doctrine, so who actually left? A good legal team should be able to punch a lot of holes in this money grab.
Why is this allowed? It is clear the $1 was a token, it seems a court would rule that only a token was required to leave. Double their money and send them $2. 😅Plus, who paid for any repairs or renovations? Local or organization? Who changed the doctrine, so who actually left? A good legal team should be able to punch a lot of holes in this money grab.