Chicago, 1893 (please read 1st reply for context, content and video link)
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Does anyone more knowledgeable than me about such things know if it's a stretch to really believe that the awesome-looking buildings made for the 1893 Chicago World's Fair were constructed in just a couple of years? The first electric drill had just barely been invented four years prior in Scotland in 1889.
For comparison, the White House was completed in the year 1900 but took eight years to build.
Then after the fair they tore down all but a couple of these buildings (there were dozens). One of these buildings was at the time the biggest building ever made and even today would be the second biggest ever. And, as noted in the video linked below, its architecture is far more impressive than the building that holds the number one spot.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ceQrsPm_Md8&list=PLHQUlKGE3pvyqO7ULX0RtsUgOQgVgSN11&index=2
What do y'all think- was Chicago the home of people with far greater architectural skills than 19th century Americans and were they wiped from the face of the Earth and erased from the history books as their cities were destroyed for otherwise seemingly no other reason? Or is it true that Americans of the time all of a sudden made all these gorgeous buildings, just for a fair, only to destroy them once the fair was over? Was the White House also built by this previous civilization or is it proof of the Americans new-found architectural skill?
Most of the buildings were facades made of plaster and mostly empty wooden structures inside. Some of the few actual buildings like the one used by the Field Museum are still standing. The worlds fair was a small area, the rest of the city didn't look like that at all.
I have yet to see anything proposed as proof of Tartaria that has been remotely convincing.
What about the canals though? Like that whole area just looks majestic. And we'll never truly know if it was plaster or not though right?
It's on the lake shore, you don't dig the canals you make a Potemkin version of Venice. Also plenty of photos showing how small this area actually was compared to the city itself.
Sorry I should've specified I didn't mean Chicago when I mentioned canals. But there was one made by Irish settlers somewhere in America during this time period where they got an unbelievable number of miles of it finished per day. Shit and I'm drawing a blank on where exactly it was, my bad. I'll have to come back and add an edit to this reply if/when I can remember.
My family lived in chicago,since long before the fire. If their was an advanced civilization their,I'm sure they would have mentioned it. We still have or did have tokens and tickets and such from these worlds fairs.
A fascinating book about this Exposition, Chicago in this period, and America's first serial killer, will tell you a lot about the construction of the Exposition Park. The book is "The Devil And The White City" by Erik Larson and it's worth the read if you enjoy history.
H. H. Holmes
Yup, he was the one. He was a twisted individual.
The Victorian age was the last great age before this knowledge was banned. This knowledge (of harmonic things like archecture, sound, light, etc) happened to be banned starting from around the time of the federal reserve.
Notice that architecture today is generally what i describe as 'non-harmonic', and is visually ugly and makes you feel confused. Harmonic architecture reaches its pinnacle in something like a great cathedral.
Tartaria IS a psyop to distract from the fact that this knowledge has been purposefully obscured, and to stop people from reviving this knowledge. Researching about the Tatars will get you nowhere, if you truly want to understand about what makes these buildings (and their construction techniques.....) special.
Don’t forget that these buildings are supposedly created from plaster as well.
Yeah that's what he says the narrative is in the video. Part of why I made the thread is cuz I have no idea, I don't even know if it's possible to tell from pictures but am hoping someone with experience in architecture maybe can say whether or not we can tell just by looking.
Edit: someone's downvoting and all I'm doing is asking questions haha...
I live in a house with plaster walls, every time I need to open a wall I need to use carbide blades cut through everything else might as well be a butter knife. The old pine lumber is stronger and denser as well breaking cheap drill bits.
Okay but this doesn't answer what I was wondering about in the above reply that you're replying to here lol.
Edit: wait I see what you're saying, that plaster is tougher than we think it is.
The downdoots mean that you're pushing against people's beliefs. I'm currently wading through a lot of Ewaranon videos discussing 19th century architecture and pondering the validity of the dating. Having an open mind rather than firm beliefs allows growth.