On June 12, 2015, just four days before Trump announced his candidacy, the DoD released the their very first edition of its Law of War Manual. Until then, DoD had never put forth a DoD-wide manual concerning the LoW. While different branches had their own manuals, a comprehensive manual didn’t exist.
I don’t think the timing of DJT’s announcement was coincidental.
It’s a LONG manual - almost 1200 pages. Chapter 11 Military Occupation (just 84 pages!) is the most relevant section. Here’s a screencap of the chapter outline.
Of importance: My read of the usage of the term ‘belligerent’ in LoW refers to a party actively in conflict on either side. In this case, belligerent occupation refers to one party’s occupation of another party’s territory during a conflict. It doesn’t mean the aggressive asshole in a particular situation.
Additionally, due to poor optics, I think MIL would be reluctant to use all the powers described in this manual.
According to 11.1.3 and 11.1.3.2, the law of belligerent (military) occupation does NOT apply to liberation of friendly territory (the US). It defines the administration of liberated friendly territory as being governed by a civil affairs agreement between the MIL and the government of the friendly territory.
Already "Not found"
log on to truth first then use the link
frens you have to log on to ts first
https://truthsocial.com/users/JFAnon/statuses/109894897811823800
On June 12, 2015, just four days before Trump announced his candidacy, the DoD released the their very first edition of its Law of War Manual. Until then, DoD had never put forth a DoD-wide manual concerning the LoW. While different branches had their own manuals, a comprehensive manual didn’t exist.
I don’t think the timing of DJT’s announcement was coincidental.
It’s a LONG manual - almost 1200 pages. Chapter 11 Military Occupation (just 84 pages!) is the most relevant section. Here’s a screencap of the chapter outline.
https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/109/894/900/621/197/144/original/03f57c984e9918d5.png
Of importance: My read of the usage of the term ‘belligerent’ in LoW refers to a party actively in conflict on either side. In this case, belligerent occupation refers to one party’s occupation of another party’s territory during a conflict. It doesn’t mean the aggressive asshole in a particular situation.
Additionally, due to poor optics, I think MIL would be reluctant to use all the powers described in this manual.
The breadth of these powers, however, is NOTABLE.
According to 11.1.3 and 11.1.3.2, the law of belligerent (military) occupation does NOT apply to liberation of friendly territory (the US). It defines the administration of liberated friendly territory as being governed by a civil affairs agreement between the MIL and the government of the friendly territory.
Washington DC is not US land.
https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/109/894/905/168/720/806/original/38b4266c8b974916.png
https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/109/894/906/306/745/835/original/3e1ea97607a46829.png
i layed it out on the post below fren. theres alot. the only way i knew of. hope it helps
https://tjaglcspublic.army.mil/documents/27431/61281/DoD+Law+of+War+Manual+-+June+2015+Updated+Dec+2016/5a02f6f8-eff3-4e79-a46f-9cd7aac74a95
And
https://files.catbox.moe/soo65b.pdf
thanks fren
https://truthsocial.com/@PaulEglot/posts/109895538712294587