My last post told you all how to get free energy, I showed you the simple device you can make at home to do it: a wimshurst machine.
Since people automatically think you're an idiot when you show this stuff, I'll let chatgpt explain the important sections this time so you can see that even the cabals robot agrees with the science, there will be a video posted alongside, showing the device in question so that the questions make sense:
Q: How many volts is a 6.5 inch spark considering the breakdown voltage of air is 30 kv/cm
A: The breakdown voltage of air is commonly approximated as 30 kilovolts per centimeter (30 kV/cm). This means that when the electric field in the air exceeds 30 kV/cm, the air will ionize and become conductive, allowing a spark to form.
Assuming that the spark in question is a 6.5 inch spark (which is about 16.5 centimeters), we can calculate the minimum voltage required to produce the spark by multiplying the breakdown voltage of air by the distance of the spark:
Minimum voltage = Breakdown voltage x Distance Minimum voltage = 30 kV/cm x 16.5 cm Minimum voltage = 495 kV
Q: If I charge 500 picofarad capacitor to 495 kilovolts, how many watts are available in the capacitor if discharged over 1 second
A: To calculate the amount of energy stored in a capacitor that has been charged to a certain voltage, we can use the following formula:
Energy = 0.5 x C x V^2
where: C = the capacitance of the capacitor, in farads V = the voltage across the capacitor, in volts
In this case, we have a capacitor with a capacitance of 500 picofarads (500 x 10^-12 farads) that has been charged to a voltage of 495 kilovolts (495,000 volts).
Plugging these values into the formula, we get:
Energy = 0.5 x 500 x 10^-12 x (495,000)^2 Energy = 61.31875 joules
So the capacitor stores 61.31875 joules of energy.
If the capacitor is discharged over 1 second, the power delivered by the capacitor can be calculated using the formula:
Power = Energy / Time
where Time is the time over which the capacitor is discharged.
In this case, the time is 1 second, so we have:
Power = 61.31875 joules / 1 second Power = 61.31875 watts
Therefore, if the 500 picofarad capacitor charged to 495 kilovolts is discharged over 1 second, the power available is approximately 61.32 watts
Q: Does a capacitor contain the same amount of energy no matter the drainage speed
A: The amount of energy stored in a capacitor is determined by its capacitance and the voltage across it. Once the capacitor is charged, the energy stored in it is independent of the discharge speed, as long as the capacitor is discharged fully.
In other words, if a capacitor is charged to a certain voltage and then discharged completely, the amount of energy released during the discharge is always the same, regardless of how quickly or slowly the discharge occurs. The discharge speed will only affect the rate at which the energy is released, which determines the power (energy per unit time) delivered by the capacitor.
However, if the capacitor is not discharged fully, the amount of energy released during the partial discharge will be proportional to the amount of charge removed from the capacitor. In this case, the discharge speed will affect the amount of charge removed per unit time, and therefore the amount of energy released per unit time (power).
So, in summary, the amount of energy stored in a capacitor is independent of the discharge speed as long as the capacitor is discharged fully. If the capacitor is not discharged fully, the amount of energy released will be proportional to the amount of charge removed, and the discharge speed will affect the power delivered
Q: If I had a hand crank generator that could easily be turned with one hand to make 61.32 watts, would that be impressive?
A: A hand crank generator that can produce 61.32 watts of power would be considered relatively high output for a human-powered generator. This amount of power would be enough to run small electronics like cell phones, laptops, and LED lights, and could also be used to charge batteries or power other low-power devices.
The ease of use of the generator would depend on a number of factors, including the design of the generator, the efficiency of the generator, and the strength and endurance of the person turning the crank. However, if the generator is designed to be easy to turn with one hand and has a high efficiency, it could be a practical and useful tool for generating power in a variety of situations, such as during power outages, camping trips, or emergency situations.
Overall, a hand crank generator that can produce 61.32 watts of power would be impressive and useful for a variety of applications, especially if it is designed to be easy to use and efficient
Q: What is the highest output hand crank generator you are aware of?
A: There are a few high output hand crank generators available on the market, with some models capable of producing several hundred watts of power. Here are a few examples:
K-Tor Power Box: This is a hand crank generator that can produce up to 120 volts and 20 watts of power. It has a durable construction and can be used to charge a variety of devices, including cell phones, laptops, and small appliances.
Pedal-A-Watt: This is a pedal-powered generator that can also be used as a hand crank generator. It can produce up to 100 watts of power, which is enough to power small appliances or tools.
Freeplay Encore: This is a hand crank generator that can produce up to 10 watts of power, which is enough to charge small electronic devices like cell phones or radios. It has a compact design and can be used for emergency power in the event of a power outage or natural disaster.
So now here's the link to the wimshurst video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3kMQJk8HZZg&t=2505s
He starts playing with it 40 minutes in and the fastest he made sparks was around 1 per second, he usually spins it up to about that speed, then let's go and talks about something while the wheels slow down and the machine continues to throw sparks.
Each of those sparks is worth 61.32 joules, he's making 61.32 watts as an average per second, whith, what looks to me to be, very little effort.
Let me ask you, how hard do you think turning those wheels is?
At 41:43 he lets go of the wheel, if we count the sparks we can count how many watts in sparks the machine produces as it spins down.
I count two full length sparks and then 1 spark that, to me looks to be around 1-2 cm long, so negligible for the last discharge.
Still, that's 122.64 joules as the thing slows down.
That's not very much effeort for it to spin down like that under load.
I never said you were
Irrelevant
Bullshit. But I refuse to argue your view of 'math' to try and disprove a known physics truth.
So you are spreading lies.
Bullshit. You are saying this because you know you cannot create the system you describe. If you did and you were correct, what I said would not matter because the rest of the world would hail you as an energy messiah.
No actually I don't. I refuse to waste my time and money on snake oil.
The only reason I said to show me is because I know you can't. You can choose to do what you want. But when you try to push bullshit lies, expect to be called out on it.
Again...if you are so dead set that this is real, make one yourself and power your home with it. Then come back and actually be the hero that you think you are in your head now.
Which ones? I asked you to bring up issues with my math and you won't.
Where's my mistake/lie.
I am asking you to highlight it and bring it up, which is a pretty small ask for an argument on a forumn considering you want me to dox myself.
You won't even tell me which part of the math you think I get wrong so that we check it.
Which part of the math did I get wrong?
Why should I participate with anything you ask? You don't want to have a discussion, which is what a forum is for, you're being a jerk.
The part that you got wrong every part that supports your claim that you can build a free energy machine. Period. Math does not work into it at all because you don't even get that far. There is no point in discussing the math of free energy just the same as there is no point in discussing the math of how to raise a corpse from the dead.
Wow...
Alright well. Leave me alone.
I don't want to interact with you any more.
Your following me and interacting with me is unwelcome.
I consider your name calling harassment.
Don't follow me across any more posts just to call me names.
If you don't want to talk that's fine. But following me across posts to name call and harass is inappropriate.
You've followed me across posts already now to continue a accusation/name calling campaign.