Sex Education = Grooming - The Great Awakening

Sex Education = Grooming (www.foxbangor.com)

posted 1 year ago by Voiyce 1 year ago by Voiyce +46 / -1

English teacher's sexuality curriculum showing kids penis pics, ejaculation video has school approval

A Pennsylvania English teacher Al Vernacchio told The New York Times that he included pornographic photographs and a video within his sexuality lesson plans.

4 comments

4 comments share save hide report block hide replies

Comments (4)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– VaccinesCauseSIDS 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

We just need to get sex ed out of schools completely. It serves no purpose other than to warp the minds of impressionable young people, and redirect limited resources from the things we actually send students to school for.

If we don't step up, others will.

Im perfectly OK with this teacher NOT teaching at all

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Voiyce [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

agreed

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– CommiesGetTheRope 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I have never once seen any evidence of harm to a child due to NOT being exposed to porn. These Pedophiles claim this porn exposure somehow protects a child from harm. If that were the case 99% of the population would be claiming they weren't Groomed at an early enough age.

Put these Groomers in prison where they can be exposed to the prison sex ed programs for 20 years to life.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– magaphraust 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I think rather than Sex Education = Grooming it should be Grooming under the guise of Sex Education

permalink save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q