A few people on here have commented how this case really wasn't feasible (generally they get heavily downpooted). Hence, I don't really think it follows that the SC wasn't doing their job/"military is the only way" etc.
I agree with you. There was a very nice post made a few weeks ago, maybe months, that I thought I saved but did not. It talked about the Federal Register and other major oddities that is ongoing...the path still leads to the LoW manual being used, and the Brunsen case does not go with it. I do agree with others, that the Brunsen case could very well just be a backup plan if all else fails.
We will see, but I didn't think the Brunsen case would lead to anything.
I have been vehemently voicing concern over this case. When known disinfo outlets are your primary voice to the public, that in itself should be an enormous red flag.
Hopefully through their failure, some anons may realize this truth and stop sucking from the tits of boar expecting milk.
A few people on here have commented how this case really wasn't feasible (generally they get heavily downpooted). Hence, I don't really think it follows that the SC wasn't doing their job/"military is the only way" etc.
I agree with you. There was a very nice post made a few weeks ago, maybe months, that I thought I saved but did not. It talked about the Federal Register and other major oddities that is ongoing...the path still leads to the LoW manual being used, and the Brunsen case does not go with it. I do agree with others, that the Brunsen case could very well just be a backup plan if all else fails.
We will see, but I didn't think the Brunsen case would lead to anything.
Raises hand.
I have been vehemently voicing concern over this case. When known disinfo outlets are your primary voice to the public, that in itself should be an enormous red flag.
Hopefully through their failure, some anons may realize this truth and stop sucking from the tits of boar expecting milk.