Like infowars. So Alex Jones losing his lawsuit means Sandy Hook was real, is that correct?
All of the mainstream media is a satire site. It's our job not to determine which sites are satire and label them, it's our job to find out what information is true and what is not.
Look at the evidence itself. Evidence is all that matters. The source of the evidence is irrelevant (unless the source IS the evidence).
Looking up the first two claims the evidence is very compelling.
Here is Richard Scobee on linkedin. Look at the pictures on the "satire site". He looks an awful lot like a 35 year older Astronaut Richard Scobee.
Here is Michael J. Smith of University of Wisconson, a professor of engineering. He looks an awful lot like a 35 year older aeronautical engineer/astronaut named Michael J. Smith.
I stopped there because I was just testing your "satire" theory (AKA an ad hominem against the presenter of the evidence, not a direct address of the evidence itself). Your theory is not supported by the evidence.
Source for "they're satire"? I assumed it was, but they are not marked as satire...
https://newspunch.com/about-us/
Like infowars. So Alex Jones losing his lawsuit means Sandy Hook was real, is that correct?
All of the mainstream media is a satire site. It's our job not to determine which sites are satire and label them, it's our job to find out what information is true and what is not.
And what does that have to do with the information provided?
It looks like you've fallen victim to a common CIA tactic of 'fruit from the poison tree.'
I saw this information long before it was ever on this site.
What makes you keep your blinders on so tight?
Same
Look at the evidence itself. Evidence is all that matters. The source of the evidence is irrelevant (unless the source IS the evidence).
Looking up the first two claims the evidence is very compelling.
Here is Richard Scobee on linkedin. Look at the pictures on the "satire site". He looks an awful lot like a 35 year older Astronaut Richard Scobee.
Here is Michael J. Smith of University of Wisconson, a professor of engineering. He looks an awful lot like a 35 year older aeronautical engineer/astronaut named Michael J. Smith.
I stopped there because I was just testing your "satire" theory (AKA an ad hominem against the presenter of the evidence, not a direct address of the evidence itself). Your theory is not supported by the evidence.