IT'S BAD, FOLKS: The WHO Treaty Is Tied to a Global Digital Passport and ID System
(brownstone.org)
BREAKING
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (121)
sorted by:
There is also wording in these amendments that can take over portions of industry in order to mobilize them against whatever "health threat" that the director of the WHO deems necessary. It can be a plandemic or it can be climate change. The emergency is basically anything he says it is. These changes also move the WHO from being an advisor to essentially a global governance mechanism with powers. Sanctions for non compliance could be heavy.
The plandemic already showed us how these elitists are willing to move in lockstep to oppress the people using threats of sanction. Threaten a state with cutting off Federal funding and that gets their attention pretty quick. All state governments rely heavily on Federal block grants and other forms of reimbursements. What would a state do if Medicaid or Medicare reimbursements were threatened? Federal education funding could be cut. The list is large and withholding could bring any state to its knees in a very short time.
The existing language for human dignity and human rights will also be completely removed. The thought of where this could lead if they get their way is frightening. This move could possibly be the mechanism that they will use to bring the entire world into compliance with their global plan. From an evil planning position, it is brilliant. They are trying to sneak these changes in under the radar. In fact, the only reason some of us even know about these amendments is because a few determined people dug through the WHO's proceedings and were able to track it down. It has not been easy. They do not want us to know. That is why they are trying to get everyone to focus on a new international health treaty. The treaty is a decoy. Americans that are aware that something is brewing are not concerned because they assume it involves the treaty - which they know would probably never get past Congress. The amendments to the IHR are not even on their radar so they blow it off. There is a reason Trump was pulling us out of the WHO. He knew what was coming.
Right. They are cunning and relentless. That was my response to a thread revealing that the Omnibus Bill contains a clause allowing the FDA to ban off-label prescribing because the FDA keeps losing in court on the issue. They will never stop.
Yes, off label prescribing is a huge part of practice. You have a toolbox and you use what is in your toolbox to find the right fit for your patient. If bean counters and AI are going to determine patient care and not the clinician, why the hell have a provider? Myself and some of my colleagues tried to warn others about where this was all headed when the ACA was passed. Of course we were not taken seriously. It has been incremental steps to essentially strip autonomy away from providers and turn us into robots following one size fits all treatment algorithms. The ICD codes are a minefield. I sidelined myself when the Rona hit. I still have my license, but trying to actually treat patients in this climate is next to impossible. I have been around long enough to know what it used to be like. The younger practitioners don't know anything different than this new system. Maybe someday when the madness is over, there will be room for us to bring some sanity back. Until then, I will find other places where I can be of service.