HERE WE GO: Lawyers Preparing to Quash Possible Indictments After Crazy Jury Forewoman Goes on Media Tour
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
JURY OF "PEERS"
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
Question for the crowd here:
Is there any comment she's made that could actually be interpreted as being unfavorable towards Trump? I've listened to two of her interviews now and she sounds like a kid but if you listen to everything she's said in a lawyerly way it's completely neutral.
Its fake news to claim this has some legal significance. This special grand jury the dimwit was a member of has no charging power. Depending on what GA law requires, either an actual grand jury returning a true bill to indict a defendant is required, or a complaint filed by the DA is required. And either of those acts will be independent of this moron chick and other fellow grand jury members.
I'm pretty certain that "bias" is not grounds to quash an indictment. If an indictment fails to charge an actual crime, that is one basis. If the grand jury did not hear any evidence that could support the charged crime, that is another. Witnesses that were not sworn in, or witnesses who lacked capacity to testify are other grounds.
You don't even need unanimity to return a true bill. Of course, every jurisdiction has different rules, but in a 16 person grand jury, only 12 yes votes would be needed in most places to return a true bill.
Great point re: it being a special grand jury.
That was my take on it too. Thank you for saying this... I don't see the legal significance here at all.
Unless another video drops of her showing clear bias - she's just expressing a neutral opinion.
Confirmation bias allows the viewer to interpret her words through two totally different lenses.
I'm with you. she could arguably be a Trump fan. concerning though that she comes across like a plant which is usually a cabal tool