No, I said the opposite. That he played both/all sides, politically. Funding the KJV was a sot to one group.
I don't defend him on anything. Just that funding the KJV didn't mean much to him, therefore you can't really discredit the KJV by stapling it to him as a fag. It doesn't matter if he was. Too many good men were martyred for producing the KJV and its largest source, the Tyndale Bible.
No, I said the opposite. That he played both/all sides, politically. Funding the KJV was a sot to one group.
I don't defend him on anything. Just that funding the KJV didn't mean much to him, therefore you can't really discredit the KJV by stapling it to him as a fag. It doesn't matter if he was. Too many good men were martyred for producing the KJV and its largest source, the Tyndale Bible.