By definition this was a simple assault. That just means that no weapons were used. One could argue that hands and feet can be used as weapons, but that's a legal technicality. One can still get jail time for any harm inflicted.
Plus, the assault woman can also seek civil damages. I would think that a jury would be sympathetic to a disabled women.
By definition this was a simple assault. That just means that no weapons were used. One could argue that hands and feet can be used as weapons, but that's a legal technicality. One can still get jail time for any harm inflicted.
Plus, the assault woman can also seek civil damages. I would think that a jury would be sympathetic to a disabled women.