Sundance is skeptical of this AZ-Sinaloa connection claim.
(theconservativetreehouse.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
In my opinion, the testimony of Jacqueline Breger is truthful and full of facts and evidence. Whether the attorney (Thaler) developed a relationship with Breger after working with her for at least 3+ years has no bearing on this.
During the course of the years-long investigation, one attorney (Thaler) learned from his hired investigators the names of some of the Cartel-affiliated prolific money launderers, forgers and thieves. In the list of names he was horrified to see a familiar name - his wife's mother's name.
Upon confronting his wife, soon he realized that he was a victim of a honey pot situation with his marriage being a sham and just a vehicle to have his own wife access his private data and report back to the Cartel, which makes this story all the more heart wrenching.
I have no such worries that Jacqueline Breger's testimony isn't valid.
This is the way Im seeing it too.
Sundance still does good work but he is way to blackpilled for me anymore. Ever since his "Chasing Durham" trip to Washington. It seems to me that trip broke him. His FISAgate stuff though is top notch.