Tracy Beanz blowing holes in John thaler's testimony
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
That's the thing I am noticing here with Sundance over at CTH, Brian Cates, and now Tracy Beanz. They all assume because J. Thuler started all of this from a child custody battle, the documents are all hearsay and baloney. I'll tell you this, when it comes to child custody and trying to get your kid back you'll find some of the greatest mind-blowing research done. I mean its detective work with a personal mission. So yes, J. Thuler could have very easily discovered a paper trail and all the things you mentioned above and more. Once a rabbit hole like this is discovered, it's a eureka moment. The motive to follow it completely through makes a complete case. This is what lawyers do. They have to answer all the questions. Also consider J. Thuler has been legally targeted and arrested over this custodial issue. When the judge is acting very peculiar in your case and showing obvious bias, it in itself becomes a motive to understand the judge's behavior (and motive) so that your name will be cleared.
I have seen some of the most extraordinary cases of research come from child custody battles. J. Thuler's research and discoveries doesn't surprise me when it comes to his motivation and resolve. If Thuler's documents are validated by vetted attorney's like Dr. David Clements, who was a former New Mexico prosecutor & law professor, he might be a good choice. Other organizations may be True the Vote, 100% Fed Up, et. al would be very helpful. Right now, the enemy is attempting to bury this story. The AZ Senate has the documents. Now, it's time to get the right people to verify it all. And move this ahead.
They are also implicitly taking the woman's side of things. Makes me think Sundance is a woman. Part of Thuler's story is that they accused him of being abusive and he was cleared by various authorities.
Did you know that a study found that some 66% of domestic abuse allegations by the estranged wife were false? That's a terrible burden put on fathers in a tribunal (it is not a jury trial), which means essential guilt until proving yourself innocent. This is a very steep incline to overcome indeed. Through the years I have a shit load of information on this.
We all know that a lot of hurtful things are said during divorce and custody proceedings, and I think that causes a reflexive skepticism. The timing doesn't seem to work out here, though. But both these critics jumped on the man immediately. It's the social norm now. Not always in the past. I've seen enough heartless moms to at least be ready to listen to him.