There is nothing in the article on the GEET reactor indicating that this device provides free or perpetual energy. It seems highly efficient, but doesn’t appear to break the laws of physics to make limitless energy. It’s just another reactor.
The article on the Hutchison effect is extremely poorly worded. You can’t shield against gravity, you can only provide a force that counteracts and exceeds the relatively weak force of gravity (like just picking something up with your hand). “Space energy” doesn’t exist, unless they’re talking about vacuum energy, in which case the article needs to use appropriate terminology and carefully define any new terminology they coin.
Hutchison provides no documentation of his alleged harassment by government entities, especially his claim that his devices were stolen and used to perpetrate 9/11. According to the rational wiki his attempts to recreate his experiment involved him using wires to suspend objects he claimed were “levitating” and dropping objects in front of an upside down camera to make things look like they were flying up against gravity. Lastly, the article you cite says at the top that the Hutchison effect makes metal levitate and explode, but at the bottom that Hutchison uses it to clean contaminated water. Awfully convenient that this effect has so many applications with no explanation of how either is accomplished.
The website you linked for Hutchison engages in blatant speculation on ancient Egyptian and Atlantean technologies with no sources, and plays fast and loose with scientific terminology to grant a false air of legitimacy. Their description of the historical use of the Ark of the Covenant is completely biblically inaccurate, and hardly any documentation is provided of their recreation of the Ark besides a few grainy photos that don’t show the whole setup. So there’s an electric arc between the Cherubim; how do we know a high voltage DC power source wasn’t connected to the Ark out of frame? What do electric arcs even have to do with the historical usage of the Ark? Why does the website only picture the electrical arcing and not the angelic apparitions that were also reported?
And then there is the UCLA SL10 Bio Super Capacitator, an energy harvester. One electrode is laser induced graphene and the other electrode is gold foil mesh, both submerged in sea water. The sea water does need changing but if submerged in the sea it will give you energy forever. It takes its energy from the environment.
My first comment was specifically aimed at scam artists who make bogus claims about free energy devices, anti gravity, or other technologies, and then hide behind the unfalsifiable claim of “the govt stole/is hiding my work so you can’t see it actually operate”, and the scientifically illiterate people who fall for these scams.
The GEET reactor doesn’t claim to be free energy, so it’s got that going for it. However, it still has problems with it’s claims, especially the one about using pressure fluctuations and vacuum to create “micro magnetic forces, producing a plasma that disassociates the hydrogen from the oxygen in the carburetor”.
Pressure and vacuum fluctuations don’t create magnetic forces, micro or otherwise. Moving electric charges create magnetic fields, but water is electrically neutral in most states, so the magnetic fields created by its moving protons are cancelled out by those created by its moving electrons. This is why water does not create a magnetic field.
Water energized into a plasma would not necessarily disassociate into hydrogen and oxygen. Electrons can be stripped away from water molecules to ionize them without breaking the molecular bonds. Some molecules might break apart at sufficiently high temperatures, but not necessarily all.
What’s the point of breaking up the water molecules anyway? Recombining them would only give you back part of the energy you just expended to break them up in the first place, and never at 100% efficiency. This is why water powered cars never took off.
GEET is a neat science experiment, but seems to be notoriously difficult to replicate, and does not translate to more efficient car engines.
There is nothing in the article on the GEET reactor indicating that this device provides free or perpetual energy. It seems highly efficient, but doesn’t appear to break the laws of physics to make limitless energy. It’s just another reactor.
The article on the Hutchison effect is extremely poorly worded. You can’t shield against gravity, you can only provide a force that counteracts and exceeds the relatively weak force of gravity (like just picking something up with your hand). “Space energy” doesn’t exist, unless they’re talking about vacuum energy, in which case the article needs to use appropriate terminology and carefully define any new terminology they coin.
Hutchison provides no documentation of his alleged harassment by government entities, especially his claim that his devices were stolen and used to perpetrate 9/11. According to the rational wiki his attempts to recreate his experiment involved him using wires to suspend objects he claimed were “levitating” and dropping objects in front of an upside down camera to make things look like they were flying up against gravity. Lastly, the article you cite says at the top that the Hutchison effect makes metal levitate and explode, but at the bottom that Hutchison uses it to clean contaminated water. Awfully convenient that this effect has so many applications with no explanation of how either is accomplished.
The website you linked for Hutchison engages in blatant speculation on ancient Egyptian and Atlantean technologies with no sources, and plays fast and loose with scientific terminology to grant a false air of legitimacy. Their description of the historical use of the Ark of the Covenant is completely biblically inaccurate, and hardly any documentation is provided of their recreation of the Ark besides a few grainy photos that don’t show the whole setup. So there’s an electric arc between the Cherubim; how do we know a high voltage DC power source wasn’t connected to the Ark out of frame? What do electric arcs even have to do with the historical usage of the Ark? Why does the website only picture the electrical arcing and not the angelic apparitions that were also reported?
Sorry, I didn't mean to post the Hutchinson effect, fat fingers.
Here is the one I meant to post. https://remoteview.substack.com/p/dan-easton-geet-gotchas-and-tips
So the GEET reactors isn't free energy? It runs on water, isn't that good enough for you?
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/o-day-can-we-run-the-world-on-cow?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2Fgeet&utm_medium=reader2
And then there is the UCLA SL10 Bio Super Capacitator, an energy harvester. One electrode is laser induced graphene and the other electrode is gold foil mesh, both submerged in sea water. The sea water does need changing but if submerged in the sea it will give you energy forever. It takes its energy from the environment.
My first comment was specifically aimed at scam artists who make bogus claims about free energy devices, anti gravity, or other technologies, and then hide behind the unfalsifiable claim of “the govt stole/is hiding my work so you can’t see it actually operate”, and the scientifically illiterate people who fall for these scams.
The GEET reactor doesn’t claim to be free energy, so it’s got that going for it. However, it still has problems with it’s claims, especially the one about using pressure fluctuations and vacuum to create “micro magnetic forces, producing a plasma that disassociates the hydrogen from the oxygen in the carburetor”.
Pressure and vacuum fluctuations don’t create magnetic forces, micro or otherwise. Moving electric charges create magnetic fields, but water is electrically neutral in most states, so the magnetic fields created by its moving protons are cancelled out by those created by its moving electrons. This is why water does not create a magnetic field.
Water energized into a plasma would not necessarily disassociate into hydrogen and oxygen. Electrons can be stripped away from water molecules to ionize them without breaking the molecular bonds. Some molecules might break apart at sufficiently high temperatures, but not necessarily all.
What’s the point of breaking up the water molecules anyway? Recombining them would only give you back part of the energy you just expended to break them up in the first place, and never at 100% efficiency. This is why water powered cars never took off.
GEET is a neat science experiment, but seems to be notoriously difficult to replicate, and does not translate to more efficient car engines.
Source: https://steemit.com/steemit/@alexbeyman/water-is-not-a-fuel-the-geet-engine-scam
The thing is that the GEET reactor works.
A lot of influential physicists are studying this, here are some of them: https://remoteview.substack.com/p/o-day-aurora-consurgens?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2Fgeet&utm_medium=reader2
If you want over unity engines "fed" by the aether (or whatever) please follow https://remoteview.substack.com/ and https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject
If anyone is going to build what you wish for its them.