I read this posting little earlier and returned to it because it caused me to think about the ramifications of what was presented in the video. The video is an interview with Dr. Bryan Ardis, D.C., who I happen to like listening to because he is interesting and provides unique perspectives to subjects. I have found there is truth in what Dr. Ardis states. Albeit, it tends to be presented as news hype. There's a saying that 'sometimes evidence presented as fact is a bridge too far'. The enemy likes to take advantage of this to discredit and mock 'truthers'. Ardis happens to be the source and promoter of the vax☠xine snake venom "conspiracy theory" that was used to discredit and divide unvax☠xers. This was the same tactic used against Alex Jones when he claimed chemicals in insecticides and herbicides like Atrazine that was running off into the water shed were "turning frogs gay". It didn't matter Jones was quoting from a published scientific study, all that mattered was his enemies found an effective narrative to attack him with. And boy-oh-boy did they ever go after Alex Jones using this against him. It was very effective in discrediting him and perhaps even used as lead-in narrative to his Sandy Hook lawsuit.

I want to be cautious here. I am not disputing Dr. Ardis' information. Rather, raising the caution flag to the "100 million animals having been injected with mRNA technology". It sounds as purported fact being another bridge too far. I mean, who is going to believe "100 million" if it is repeated? Unfortunately, Dr. Ardis already has some credibility issues from the 'snake venom' news hype. I presciently see the "100 million" being used by the pro-vax☠x lobby to attack and mock anyone opposed to their roll out of mRNA vax☠xines.