You'd think in the age of wide open internet, and in all sorts of absolute expertise in EVERY field of science, someone who is an expert in human anatomy, aging, etc, would be able to provide a critical and empirical, evidence-based analysis of why Joe Blow is Not Joe Blow.
kek. Good idea.
You'd think in the age of wide open internet, and in all sorts of absolute expertise in EVERY field of science, someone who is an expert in human anatomy, aging, etc, would be able to provide a critical and empirical, evidence-based analysis of why Joe Blow is Not Joe Blow.
Yet to see one. But Hey, It MUST be! right?