The science is only as good as the people running it. You can use science to help people or to hurt people, it depends who runs it. Vaccines have been co-opted very early on. As most people here, you are no doubt aware that aborted fetal tissue is used in the production of almost all vaccines. To be clear, according to them, no new babies are being aborted for this purpose. It is all an original set of cells from many years ago that continue to be replicated. However, if they wanted to remove what they call vaccine hesitancy, why give anyone an excuse not to take their vaccines. It's actually done on purpose. It seems pretty clear that they want to link everyone to abortion any way they can. What makes this obvious is that there are alternative production methods that use animal cells and therefore have no link to aborted human babies. However, in most places, those vaccines are next to impossible to find. I think you can potentially get them in Japan. And even more obvious, if you are able to find them, the government in most places will refuse to pay for them but will fund the aborted tissue based vaccines (this is definitely the case in Canada). So I would say that the technology of vaccines is not fundamentally bad. It got rid of small pox which was a horrible disease. However, the people running it now are not to be trusted and I personally do not trust them as well.
Also, contrary to what the media is feeding everyone, science is not a religion and cannot sustain itself. Science is a tool. Basically, it is only as good as the people conducting it. And just like our society, which can work when honest and good people inhabit the positions of power, it also will produce bad results when dishonest and evil people inhabit those positions. Same with science, once dishonest and evil people took over the scientific institutions, it was no longer wise to blindly trust the answers they were giving us because either they manipulated them to further their own career (so they aren't true) or they are feeding us false answers so we do what they want us to do (but secretly they know the right answers but those would stop us from doing what they want). Or put it another way, you wouldn't have your enemy build your house, they would sabotage it to hurt you. In the same way, you wouldn't have a crook build you a house, he would cut corners everywhere he can so he can pocket the difference. And you would end up with a substandard house. That is now how our society and science function right now with the worst people being at the helm.
The science is only as good as the people running it. You can use science to help people or to hurt people, it depends who runs it. Vaccines have been co-opted very early on. As most people here, you are no doubt aware that aborted fetal tissue is used in the production of almost all vaccines. To be clear, according to them, no new babies are being aborted for this purpose. It is all an original set of cells from many years ago that continue to be replicated. However, if they wanted to remove what they call vaccine hesitancy, why give anyone an excuse not to take their vaccines. It's actually done on purpose. It seems pretty clear that they want to link everyone to abortion any way they can. What makes this obvious is that there are alternative production methods that use animal cells and therefore have no link to aborted human babies. However, in most places, those vaccines are next to impossible to find. I think you can potentially get them in Japan. And even more obvious, if you are able to find them, the government in most places will refuse to pay for them but will fund the aborted tissue based vaccines (this is definitely the case in Canada). So I would say that the technology of vaccines is not fundamentally bad. It got rid of small pox which was a horrible disease. However, the people running it now are not to be trusted and I personally do not trust them as well.
Also, contrary to what the media is feeding everyone, science is not a religion and cannot sustain itself. Science is a tool. Basically, it is only as good as the people conducting it. And just like our society, which can work when honest and good people inhabit the positions of power, it also will produce bad results when dishonest and evil people inhabit those positions. Same with science, once dishonest and evil people took over the scientific institutions, it was no longer wise to blindly trust the answers they were giving us because either they manipulated them to further their own career (so they aren't true) or they are feeding us false answers so we do what they want us to do (but secretly they know the right answers but those would stop us from doing what they want). Or put it another way, you wouldn't have your enemy build your house, they would sabotage it to hurt you. In the same way, you wouldn't have a crook build you a house, he would cut corners everywhere he can so he can pocket the difference. And you would end up with a substandard house. That is now how our society and science function right now with the worst people being at the helm.