As I said in my original response, he does not explain how the conjunctions affect Earth...people are merely assuming that it's gravitational, but he doesn't actually SAY that in the video. We are left to intuit what forces are at work, and it's THAT that I am faulting him for.
There are several definitions of "conjunction" ( https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conjunction ) but the guy doesn't indicate which definition he's referring to. He's just sloppy in his approach...vague terms, unknown forces at work, conclusions left to the viewer, and so on.
The obvious effect, if you think about it, is a possible gravitational pull on the earth. Being obvious and using common language meant I didn't see any further explanation required. Anybody can see which meaning of conjunction applies here. We're talking objects in the sky, not "buts" and "ands."
As I said in my original response, he does not explain how the conjunctions affect Earth...people are merely assuming that it's gravitational, but he doesn't actually SAY that in the video. We are left to intuit what forces are at work, and it's THAT that I am faulting him for.
There are several definitions of "conjunction" ( https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conjunction ) but the guy doesn't indicate which definition he's referring to. He's just sloppy in his approach...vague terms, unknown forces at work, conclusions left to the viewer, and so on.
The obvious effect, if you think about it, is a possible gravitational pull on the earth. Being obvious and using common language meant I didn't see any further explanation required. Anybody can see which meaning of conjunction applies here. We're talking objects in the sky, not "buts" and "ands."