It's important to not push fake stories, because they rightfully destroy our credibility.
*Jovan Hutton Pulitzer's take: https://rumble.com/v2bcpge-madness-in-maricopa-the-curious-cases-of-john-thaler-and-cartel-collusion.html
*Robert Barnes also said it looked like BS on Viva and Barnes a couple weeks ago.
I think I recall Jovan Hutton Pulitzer not coming through on his big election fraud booms. After being a total flop and disappointment, he seems to like picking fights too. He falsely claimed Dr. David Clements as being a convicted felon and then posted Clements personal cell phone. Why would he do that? Since then, Pulitzer has posted voicemails and screenshots, including their phone numbers, of people sending him texts attempting to reestablish some sanity in him. Pulitzer's feud threatened the cohesion of election fraud movement apart.
Why is Pulitzer casting shade on J. Thaler now? How does he know anything? Pulitzer hasn't produced a damn thing about election fraud that I know of. The big brouhaha about markings on ballots in Arizona. How many millions of dollars were needlessly spent on a scanning show? Was this central to the AZ election fraud? No, I don't think so. Did it help us prove there was election fraud. No. It did not.
All I can ask is where the hell has Jovan Hutton Pulitzer been. Now, he reappears for this?
IMHO, J. Thuler's documents will be vetted by another party. It may be by the direction of the AZ Senate themselves. Any talk right now about Thuler's documents all being fraud are reckless opinions lacking the documents to prove other.
I posted the Pulitzer video because I couldn't find the exact timestamp of Robert Barnes discussing why this story had very low credibility. (Pulitzer and Cyberninjas did a good job with the audit, but Karen Fann made people water down the conclusions of the audit. Remember Bill Gates deleting subpoena'd materials, Brnovich not going after people deleting election data, and Maricopa County not delivering the Splunk Logs)
*If I can find the Barnes video, I'll send it to you.
**The important point is that Thaler made big claims that should be able to be corroborated. However it's been a while, and I haven't seen any credible people endorsing his claims.
And Karen Fann was retiring after she got a sweetheart deal. Her husband was given the contract for maintaining the AZ highways..... It appeared to be just given to him.
I agree. Since we have no other alternative to wait and see, we need to be careful of the public influencers, especially when they have none of the documents. In time, we'll learn about Thaler's research and its authenticity of documents.
Fair enough, I agree. (I'd change my title to "I'd be hesitant to believe this story" rather than "it's false")
*I'd still be wary it's a "poison the well" scenario, tho.
**And I wouldn't pin your hopes on this story either. (like the Brunson Brothers case)
We're good. Continue being vigilant, soldier. Now get up in that watch tower.
Note--this is always wrong--Karen's ex husband-several years ago they divorced-her ex runs a very successful business--I live 15 miles from her and 5 miles away from ex husband I do believe she accepted a similar deal offered to Kary Lake--- Very disappointed
Do you have any evidence of this "deal"? Otherwise, your belief hearsay. Living 15 miles from her and 5 miles from her ex-hubby is inferring that you know them personally and are friends. I'm reading beyond this and "believe" you don't know them nor do you know Catherine (not "Karen"). For you to say you "believe" Catherine accepted a "deal". is inappropriate and slanderous.