And you have little to say for your request of me. I have provided you an answer, and, like a true debater in bad faith, you have dismissed the answer. No dabbling, by the way. One can do a lot in 40 years. How much advanced engineering have you contributed? I try not to call people "idiots" (I have compassion for actual idiots), but I have no qualms about stating that people are ignorant if they don't know what they are talking about.
Ok good for you. I guess Im not understanding why you are on a rampage. I posted what I have noticed in my world, a post that others understand. You comment and basically have said anyone who does believe what you have said about chemtrails is an idiot. We come here from all backgrounds, some with bigger credentials than yours and some with less, BUT we treat each other as equals. The thing is you dont have to believe in it. I do. The fact that you have worked in the “classified” arena still does not make you privy to all things. There are all kinds of projects you will never be exposed to even with your classification. I hope you have a wonderful day.
Which is all bluster to cover the fact that you are unqualified to have an opinion if you cannot relate "chemtrails" to known and observed properties of contrails. Common courtesy is one thing, but it is not true that all opinions are equally creditable. "Chemtrail" advocacy is marked by ignorance of the relevant atmospheric physics, and absence of any evidence. (Supposition is not evidence.)
And you have little to say for your request of me. I have provided you an answer, and, like a true debater in bad faith, you have dismissed the answer. No dabbling, by the way. One can do a lot in 40 years. How much advanced engineering have you contributed? I try not to call people "idiots" (I have compassion for actual idiots), but I have no qualms about stating that people are ignorant if they don't know what they are talking about.
Ok good for you. I guess Im not understanding why you are on a rampage. I posted what I have noticed in my world, a post that others understand. You comment and basically have said anyone who does believe what you have said about chemtrails is an idiot. We come here from all backgrounds, some with bigger credentials than yours and some with less, BUT we treat each other as equals. The thing is you dont have to believe in it. I do. The fact that you have worked in the “classified” arena still does not make you privy to all things. There are all kinds of projects you will never be exposed to even with your classification. I hope you have a wonderful day.
Which is all bluster to cover the fact that you are unqualified to have an opinion if you cannot relate "chemtrails" to known and observed properties of contrails. Common courtesy is one thing, but it is not true that all opinions are equally creditable. "Chemtrail" advocacy is marked by ignorance of the relevant atmospheric physics, and absence of any evidence. (Supposition is not evidence.)