No frustration yet anyway. Regarding this very important expose, Both Steve Bannon and Sharyl Attkinson are saying Murdoch shut Tucker Carlson down........ As always, we'll have to wait and see. From this point on, what will we see with the Tucker Carlson revelations? TGP thinks there is evidence of it from Tucker Carlson's Tuesday night’s show stating it "was tampered down" and was tepid. TGP tends to be news-hyped at times, but are overall trustworthy and truthful. What will Wednesday night's show reveal? Hopefully, it is explosive like the first night. If not, then the question will increasingly be - Is Tucker Carlson being throttled as TGP reports? If Carlson is being shut down, what kind of airing, if any, will allow the information to be fully revealed?

Since Murdoch News is, as Steve Bannon rightly calls, a foreign owned entity, and the Murdoch's are all CFR members and part of the global elite, the entire idea of House Speaker McCarthy handing over 41,000 hours of Jan 6 Capitol footage to Tucker Carlson at FOX News, is bound to run into problems. What happens if Carlson is not able to present the entirety of the 41,000 J6 footage and all of this turns into a manipulated and neutered expose? What will House Speaker McCarthy say then? I already find it interesting in the least that McCarthy set up what effectively could be called a SCIF for Tucker Carlson and his crew to view the footage. They are being allowed to show the footage, but are we, the people, going to see all of it so we can determine for ourselves what the truth is? Why Tucker Carlson anyway? IMHO, Kevin McCarthy should have a plan B other than Tucker Carlson. Hopefully, we'll soon find out whether Sharyl Attkinson and Steve Bannon are correct. I agree with Jim Hoft at TGP that they should be lined up for at least vetting Tucker Carlson's work. I'd even prefer James O'Keefe to be allowed to vet Tucker Carlson's work for ensuring the information is not throttled or shutdown in anyway.