I agree - numbers are exaggerated. My (rural US) county posted 28% 'had received at least one dose' at its highest, then they stopped publishing numbers. We received the vaccine in our (very red) area about 6 weeks after the large population areas started theirs, and the first few days of administration here had several bad events. People passing out in the '15 minute' post-shot waiting period in the health department waiting room. Word got out quickly about those problems. As the weeks went on (about 6 weeks, as I recall) more jabbed people had heart attacks/strokes and the folks around here quickly associated the jab with the heart problems. Even the local health department and municipal offices didn't require the jab for their employees. I don't think our town is much different than a lot of other rural communities around the US. (I believe that a high part of that 28% were nursing home populations and the staff because jabs were mandated in those businesses. Lost a lot of NH patients from 'covid'.)
At 99.97% recovery rate, I never considered an injection or a mask. Why? That high recovery rate only applies to those who actually got sick. A lot of us never got sick and ever got tested, which I believe is why we didn't get sick. The 99.97% only applied to the people who got sick. The risk of death from eating peanut butter is higher.
User Clip: Operation Mockingbird exposed on C-Span
A caller to Washington Journal, May 27, 2018, raised the repeal of the Smith Mundt Act, legalizing domestic propaganda and the complicity of the media with the Deep State. The Daily Beast's Eleanor Clift dismissed this fact as a conspiracy theory, but the Washington Times' Cheryl Chumley reminded her of Operation Mockingbird in which intelligence assets were placed in the media. Eleanor looked very unconfortable....
That's true. But it's easy to forget that during the Obummer years, there was a constant push towards more and more vaccines, in spite of the evidence coming out about autism and other vaccine related injuries. Anyone who questioned the efficacy and safety of vaccines was ridiculed and openly mocked. They were preparing the world through propaganda, and flu shots. How many large companies had free flu shots the last few years?
I agree - numbers are exaggerated. My (rural US) county posted 28% 'had received at least one dose' at its highest, then they stopped publishing numbers. We received the vaccine in our (very red) area about 6 weeks after the large population areas started theirs, and the first few days of administration here had several bad events. People passing out in the '15 minute' post-shot waiting period in the health department waiting room. Word got out quickly about those problems. As the weeks went on (about 6 weeks, as I recall) more jabbed people had heart attacks/strokes and the folks around here quickly associated the jab with the heart problems. Even the local health department and municipal offices didn't require the jab for their employees. I don't think our town is much different than a lot of other rural communities around the US. (I believe that a high part of that 28% were nursing home populations and the staff because jabs were mandated in those businesses. Lost a lot of NH patients from 'covid'.)
At 99.97% recovery rate, I never considered an injection or a mask. Why? That high recovery rate only applies to those who actually got sick. A lot of us never got sick and ever got tested, which I believe is why we didn't get sick. The 99.97% only applied to the people who got sick. The risk of death from eating peanut butter is higher.
Fear is the best motivator.
Skip to 1:30
Daily Beast rep chimes right in with "conspiracy theory"
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4731767/user-clip-operation-mockingbird-exposed-span
User Clip: Operation Mockingbird exposed on C-Span A caller to Washington Journal, May 27, 2018, raised the repeal of the Smith Mundt Act, legalizing domestic propaganda and the complicity of the media with the Deep State. The Daily Beast's Eleanor Clift dismissed this fact as a conspiracy theory, but the Washington Times' Cheryl Chumley reminded her of Operation Mockingbird in which intelligence assets were placed in the media. Eleanor looked very unconfortable....
She looked uncomfortable because Operation Mockingbird is ongoing and she's apart of it.
That's true. But it's easy to forget that during the Obummer years, there was a constant push towards more and more vaccines, in spite of the evidence coming out about autism and other vaccine related injuries. Anyone who questioned the efficacy and safety of vaccines was ridiculed and openly mocked. They were preparing the world through propaganda, and flu shots. How many large companies had free flu shots the last few years?