An Ivermectin Influencer Died. Now His Followers Are Worried About Their Own 'Severe' Symptoms.
(www.vice.com)
🤢 MSM SCUMBAGS 🤢
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (86)
sorted by:
I agree those parts of the article are conjecture.
Now, I'll offer the parts I believe are not conjecture and you tell me where we're at with respect to your definition of the word "all":
https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8xZTBhZDg0L3BvZGNhc3QvcnNz/episode/NzUyYWYxZWMtN2U0ZC00NWJlLWE2NmYtZjM3YTBhMzVhMjJh?ep=14
Danny Lemoi had Lyme Disease (and a pile of other critical health issues).
Danny Lemoi took Ivermectin like a fiend.
Danny Lemoi survived for ten years while taking Ivermectin.
The Telegram channel posted that he died of an enlarged heart and his death was marked as being from natural causes.
Fair enough on the word "all". But like I tell my kids, dont be a drama queen and stretch for meaning where it does not exist.
With facts and conjecture now agreeably separated, what is your take on this article and how it fits in the information war?
How do you figure I'm stretching for meaning?
It still reads like a gay hit piece designed to discourage use of IVM, written by a 2 bit biased idiot working for a 2 bit biased publisher.
Your seemingly reading deeper into the articles intentions. Its surface only intent is to dissuade its regular readers from using IVM.
Agreed that that is the surface intent.
How supportive are the agreed facts of that surface intent? How strong is a narrative is advanced on a fragile foundation? If you were running ops for the cabal, would you run an article like this?
Can we agree to listen to Lemoi's podcast and reconvene for further analysis later?