He may be correct. However, the timing is way off and seems premature. The banking system can't just switch to CBDC. There are far too many things not in place yet. I believe SVB would have been strung along by the FDIC and the Federal Reserve, along with other banks when they increasingly become insolvent, but 'something' happened causing them to prematurely pull the trigger. They would have otherwise collected these fully subsidized banks in a big basket of unannounced insolvencies. Later, when JP Morgan and Bank of America, and Wells Fargo are added to this basket, then the FDIC and Federal Reserve would announce it to the world causing massive financial panic. They would have their plan of the Great Reset with CBDC ready as the only solution. Let's look at the SVB and why it was forced to declare insolvency.

The FDIC knew for over 2 months that SVB was going to become insolvent. I don't like using the words 'banking crash' because the FDIC and the Federal Reserve have the final say on 'if' and 'when' a bank becomes insolvent. There seems to be another reason for its timing and why the SVB had to close their doors. The SVB upper management provides us tantalizing clues. We learned the CEO and high level management were selling off their stock and providing bonuses to themselves just prior to closing the doors. How convenient.

IMHO, the SVB event was contrived and timed for the purpose of providing a needed change to the news cycle narrative Tucker Carlson produced on 06-03-23. I believe all those who were involved (SVB big name customers and banking officials alike) knew beforehand that the Biden administration would protect them from the fallout. They were promised no one would lose their money and everyone would have an insurance policy. The event was for creating a desperately needed narrative change for taking the heat off from the real criminals behind the J6 prosecutions. Tucker Carlson releasing 06-03-23 Monday's videos caused panic and triggered this event. With the FDIC knowing about SVB, it sure gave them a timetable for when they could call for pulling the plug. So far, it sure seems to be working out this way.

There's even more to the SVB closing that's not yet being reported. We learned that the winery industry in California was using SVB for their financing operations. I posted earlier that Gavin Newsom owned a winery and surmised that he was connected to SVB. Well, it turns out Newsom is indeed involved. We also learned the Nancy and Paul Pelosi used SVB as their bank. I'll bet that Pelosi's son Paul Jr. uses SVB for financing too. Is it any surprise SVB was financing green energy companies?... ergo, solar having ties to the CCP were SVB. As time goes on I believe it will be revealed SVB was an on-shore laundering operation for the Democrats. I don't have any evidence of this, but I have a hunch that the Ukraine operation with all of its US foreign aid may in part go through this bank (and others like Signature Bank, etc.). We'll have to wait and see. The Republican Congress need to get hot on this and see if any of the Ukrainian foreign aid is being back channeled to democrats. I smell the stink of a rat with this SV bank.