Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 95 studies
95 ivermectin COVID-19 controlled studies. 82% improvement for prophylaxis, p < 0.0001. 62% improvement for early treatment, p < 0.0001. 42% improvement for late treatment, p < 0.0001. ivmmeta
COLLUSION: Merck, Big Pharma trying to kill off all generic ivermectin production because it’s cutting into profits – NaturalNews.com https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-03-02-big-pharma-kill-ivermectin-cutting-profits.html
Thanks. There was a concern smear on here earlier.
"Probability results are from an ineffective treatment. The evidence of a negative publication bias allows us to perform an additional analysis. If treatment was not effective, and there is no publication bias, the results of studies should be randomly distributed. We can compute the probability that the observed percentage of positive results (or higher) could occur due to chance with an ineffective treatment, which is the probability of >= k heads in n coin tosses, or the one-sided sign test / binomial test. 79 of 95 studies report a positive result. The probability of this happening due to chance with an ineffective treatment is 1 in 58 billion. Publication bias will affect this estimate. Correcting for a negative bias will further decrease the chance that the results are from an ineffective treatment."
What?! 1 in 58 billion! Wow!
About the WHO quote..."This appears to be based primarily on excluding the majority of the evidence, and by assigning bias estimates that do not match the actual risk of bias in studies."