You presented a plausible case, yet in your polemic you said- "...you can't hide a 200K trial." Where have I heard this type of statement before? I'll tell you this. If there is a will, there is a way. Hiding Manhatten Project types of experiments has been done before. If we look at how long this pandemic was actually planned, the mock pandemic drills, how many dry-runs occurred leading up to this very point were tested, analyzed, and adjusted for, its not out of the realm of possibilities that some very surreptitious studies across America's universities and colleges could occur. I recall back in the 1970s seeing university postings for medical experimental studies all the time. They offered subjects cash to take part in the studies. To a cash-strapped college student, this was a tempting way to earn some extra bucks. The natural compartmentalization of these studies IMHO would be a no-brainer for the summation for of a 200k trial. We know via the patent research work of Dr. David Martin implicating DARPA, the DoD, Moderna, and Pfizer, along with some other government agencies, the mRNA injectoid can be easily traced to 2001 and before.
I don't doubt the veracity of your missive. In the end, we simply don't know for sure. The video of the 2013 mRNA test dude provides too little information for validation. If possible, a deep dive into this matter is warranted.
I don't disagree with much of what you said. I will mention that what we saw with COVID is that hiding the truth is very difficult in this day, you can find trails pretty much everywhere if you look. Making up data is fucking hard, we are not omniscient. The less specific someone is with a claim, the more likely they are trying to bullshit you into believing it, which is what I believe I'm seeing here.
And "not knowing something for sure" is an argument I have grown cold to. The socialists and communists use this all the time to sow the seed of doubt. You can be confident in what you know while at the same time willing to change your mind if new evidence comes to light.
You seemed skeptical about his claim. Good! Trust your judgements.
You presented a plausible case, yet in your polemic you said- "...you can't hide a 200K trial." Where have I heard this type of statement before? I'll tell you this. If there is a will, there is a way. Hiding Manhatten Project types of experiments has been done before. If we look at how long this pandemic was actually planned, the mock pandemic drills, how many dry-runs occurred leading up to this very point were tested, analyzed, and adjusted for, its not out of the realm of possibilities that some very surreptitious studies across America's universities and colleges could occur. I recall back in the 1970s seeing university postings for medical experimental studies all the time. They offered subjects cash to take part in the studies. To a cash-strapped college student, this was a tempting way to earn some extra bucks. The natural compartmentalization of these studies IMHO would be a no-brainer for the summation for of a 200k trial. We know via the patent research work of Dr. David Martin implicating DARPA, the DoD, Moderna, and Pfizer, along with some other government agencies, the mRNA injectoid can be easily traced to 2001 and before.
I don't doubt the veracity of your missive. In the end, we simply don't know for sure. The video of the 2013 mRNA test dude provides too little information for validation. If possible, a deep dive into this matter is warranted.
I don't disagree with much of what you said. I will mention that what we saw with COVID is that hiding the truth is very difficult in this day, you can find trails pretty much everywhere if you look. Making up data is fucking hard, we are not omniscient. The less specific someone is with a claim, the more likely they are trying to bullshit you into believing it, which is what I believe I'm seeing here.
And "not knowing something for sure" is an argument I have grown cold to. The socialists and communists use this all the time to sow the seed of doubt. You can be confident in what you know while at the same time willing to change your mind if new evidence comes to light.
You seemed skeptical about his claim. Good! Trust your judgements.
It's all the gut.... this discerning business tis.