My research has led me to think that the only solution that doesn't lead right back to the same problem is to recognize, to fully understand, to grok our own individual agency. I think we must learn, deep, deep down, both individually and as a group the fundamental concept of respect of self, respect of "other," and respect of the connections between us. We must learn that we have been separated on purpose, and that we have all been lied to.
I think it's also important to learn to appreciate that the governmental systems we have been offered are all flawed, and they are flawed in the same way. They all make jurisdictional claims they have no right to. Even the Constitution has these flaws, and people must see these jurisdictional frauds or we will lead right back to where we are. I don't see how it can be any other way, because the frauds are built in to our entire belief system, placed there thousands of years ago, by the same Cabal that we call "the enemy" today.
It is where people agree that the problems lie; not all places where people agree, but rather, the places that all of the formal "sides" agree. For example, Capitalism, Socialism, Communism, and Fascism all have commonalities. They all create Centralized Authorities. They all offer "outs" to this centralized authority, but they all have them fundamentally tied in, from which there can be no escape within the framework of their fundamental construction. They are tied in so deeply, that almost no one can even understand what it means to not have Centralized Authorities. I suggest it is where everyone agrees, not just in these particular "isms," but in our concepts of "government" or even social hierarchy that all the most important fuckery happens.
My research also suggests that pretty much everything is controlled opposition. For example, all of the “isms” shown above have the same source. They were all created by the same group of people. How can you ensure you always win? If you create all the sides, pit them against each other in perpetuity, get them arguing, divided, all sides seeing little pieces of the truth, none seeing the Whole Truth, all focusing on their own planted oppositional stances, then you control the narrative and thus the direction of the whole argument. To ensure that what you want comes out the other end, just put in pieces where everyone agrees. When “the war” (contrived) is over, what emerges will be “the compromise” (or maybe just the “victor’s” ideals). What emerges will automatically have that commonality built in, because it was never debated, fought about, or ever even questioned at all.
If what emerges out the other side of “The Plan” doesn’t appreciate the inevitable jurisdictional fraud in the concept of The Authority, if we come out with any system of government that has even a possibility of making laws that can lay claim to an Individuals Jurisdiction, or one that demands that everyone must be a part of it, or that doesn’t have a reasonable “opt out,” we will have lost.
Q is almost certainly a group of insiders to the same Cabal that has been ruling forever. That is, according to my research, exactly how all offices of controlled opposition have been created; people who are intimately tied to "the enemy", but act as if they are "the friend," intentionally leading the opposition, filling the need for that role.
The only way to discern whether or not Q is controlled opposition or actual opposition is to watch what it happening with a critical eye. If we aren’t lead out from The Authority completely, then I suggest Q is not what Q suggests it is (for We The People). The Plan looks like it is leading to the conclusion I have suggested, but it could be misleading. I therefore fall into the camp of “hopeful, but wary,” which is not offered in the Prison of Two Ideas in the OP.
The ole' "Prison of Two Ideas."
There are other types of anons.
My research has led me to think that the only solution that doesn't lead right back to the same problem is to recognize, to fully understand, to grok our own individual agency. I think we must learn, deep, deep down, both individually and as a group the fundamental concept of respect of self, respect of "other," and respect of the connections between us. We must learn that we have been separated on purpose, and that we have all been lied to.
I think it's also important to learn to appreciate that the governmental systems we have been offered are all flawed, and they are flawed in the same way. They all make jurisdictional claims they have no right to. Even the Constitution has these flaws, and people must see these jurisdictional frauds or we will lead right back to where we are. I don't see how it can be any other way, because the frauds are built in to our entire belief system, placed there thousands of years ago, by the same Cabal that we call "the enemy" today.
It is where people agree that the problems lie; not all places where people agree, but rather, the places that all of the formal "sides" agree. For example, Capitalism, Socialism, Communism, and Fascism all have commonalities. They all create Centralized Authorities. They all offer "outs" to this centralized authority, but they all have them fundamentally tied in, from which there can be no escape within the framework of their fundamental construction. They are tied in so deeply, that almost no one can even understand what it means to not have Centralized Authorities. I suggest it is where everyone agrees, not just in these particular "isms," but in our concepts of "government" or even social hierarchy that all the most important fuckery happens.
My research also suggests that pretty much everything is controlled opposition. For example, all of the “isms” shown above have the same source. They were all created by the same group of people. How can you ensure you always win? If you create all the sides, pit them against each other in perpetuity, get them arguing, divided, all sides seeing little pieces of the truth, none seeing the Whole Truth, all focusing on their own planted oppositional stances, then you control the narrative and thus the direction of the whole argument. To ensure that what you want comes out the other end, just put in pieces where everyone agrees. When “the war” (contrived) is over, what emerges will be “the compromise” (or maybe just the “victor’s” ideals). What emerges will automatically have that commonality built in, because it was never debated, fought about, or ever even questioned at all.
If what emerges out the other side of “The Plan” doesn’t appreciate the inevitable jurisdictional fraud in the concept of The Authority, if we come out with any system of government that has even a possibility of making laws that can lay claim to an Individuals Jurisdiction, or one that demands that everyone must be a part of it, or that doesn’t have a reasonable “opt out,” we will have lost.
Q is almost certainly a group of insiders to the same Cabal that has been ruling forever. That is, according to my research, exactly how all offices of controlled opposition have been created; people who are intimately tied to "the enemy", but act as if they are "the friend," intentionally leading the opposition, filling the need for that role.
The only way to discern whether or not Q is controlled opposition or actual opposition is to watch what it happening with a critical eye. If we aren’t lead out from The Authority completely, then I suggest Q is not what Q suggests it is (for We The People). The Plan looks like it is leading to the conclusion I have suggested, but it could be misleading. I therefore fall into the camp of “hopeful, but wary,” which is not offered in the Prison of Two Ideas in the OP.