Kingston explains, “Unlike any other contract I have ever read before, the contract says right up front the President said they had to produce a safe and effective vaccine, and they would have to promise it would protect against SARS-Cov-2 infections and all its variants. Oh, and by the way, all those Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) laws that give you immunity under Obama and Bush, Jr., you are going to forfeit those. . . . Trump said he wanted it by October 31, and the vaccine must be safe and effective. This was not safe and effective under the emergency use vaccine even though it was going to be EUA authorized.
Was this the reason Trump stated "The vaccine is safe & effective!"? To point out that they have to produce them according the contract, but didn't?
Was this the reason Trump stated "The vaccine is safe & effective!"? To point out that they have to produce them according the contract, but didn't?