I don't know why you would think that. I read through and see giant discrepancies in the narrative. I mean fundamental stuff. Nothing wrong with that except when there's a pretense that it doesn't exist. Imo.
Think of it like its another world war. Lets say a general says you and your families will be safe. Then a million guys go die. But your homeland is safe, your wife isnt getting raped, your daughter sold off, your lands burned, etc. But your dad dies. Is your family not safe- sans the necessary death that occurs in warfare?
We are in war. Many die in war. The q posts are either misdirection, to comfort, or hyperbolic.
I thought we all understood whats going on. Guess not.
I don't know why you would think that. I read through and see giant discrepancies in the narrative. I mean fundamental stuff. Nothing wrong with that except when there's a pretense that it doesn't exist. Imo.
The "chosen scenario" has already lead to millions of deaths... and that's just so far.
When pretty much everyone's dead, should I start having my doubts about "you and your families will be safe"?
Even though I'm sure -YOU- are safe, should trusting your government be a fatal error for the sheeple?
Think of it like its another world war. Lets say a general says you and your families will be safe. Then a million guys go die. But your homeland is safe, your wife isnt getting raped, your daughter sold off, your lands burned, etc. But your dad dies. Is your family not safe- sans the necessary death that occurs in warfare?
We are in war. Many die in war. The q posts are either misdirection, to comfort, or hyperbolic.