...The letter appears to be in direct conflict with Cohen¿s sworn testimony to Congress given a year later. Cohen said under oath that Trump ¿asked me to pay off an adult film star with whom he had an affair,¿ and that ¿Mr. Trump directed me to use my own personal funds from a Home Equity Line of Credit to avoid any money being traced back to him that could negatively impact his campaign'...
In other words:
"I, Mikey Cohen, gave my money to a whore who was slinging mud at Trump with a false accusation, using my own personal money. Later, after I realized that Trump was going to win the 2024 election,I decided to blame Trump for making me give my money to the whore, and assist a radical left wing nut job pursue a felony conviction against Trump for a crime that he never committed."
A lot of legal people are saying a DA doesn’t have to present exculpatory evidence in a Grand Jury proceeding. I’m not a lawyer and online searching gives me a mixed bag. I’m not holding my breath that this helps Trump. Wait and see I guess.
Hmmm. I'm no Clarence Darrow, but I think they call that per-jury. Lying your ass off for political gain.
Oh boy.
You would think that they could take a look at bank records and see it for themselves.
It’s easier to lie and frame a former President that suits their demonic agenda a lot better.
In other words:
"I, Mikey Cohen, gave my money to a whore who was slinging mud at Trump with a false accusation, using my own personal money. Later, after I realized that Trump was going to win the 2024 election,I decided to blame Trump for making me give my money to the whore, and assist a radical left wing nut job pursue a felony conviction against Trump for a crime that he never committed."
A lot of legal people are saying a DA doesn’t have to present exculpatory evidence in a Grand Jury proceeding. I’m not a lawyer and online searching gives me a mixed bag. I’m not holding my breath that this helps Trump. Wait and see I guess.
Liars gona lie!