"Obfuscation" is intentionally hiding the truth. I am trying to do the opposite. Sometimes a "yes" or "no" doesn't capture the answer, even if the questioner believes it will. I suggest you are seeing it as obfuscation because you aren't actually reading what I'm writing.
And I am an engineer. Obviously you've never written nor read documentation.
You asked me about absolute truth, one of the most debated topics of all time. I gave you a TWENTY SECOND lecture on that incredibly complicated topic. You didn't even read it. If you had taken that twenty seconds, you probably wouldn't have had a problem with it, you would have gotten your answer, and it would have saved us both a lot of time.
Are you one of those people who think there is no such thing as absolute truth?
No. I am not one of "those people."
If you had taken twenty seconds to read my previous response you would know that. You would also understand why I think the question itself is flawed, at least by apparent intent.
"Obfuscation" is intentionally hiding the truth. I am trying to do the opposite. Sometimes a "yes" or "no" doesn't capture the answer, even if the questioner believes it will. I suggest you are seeing it as obfuscation because you aren't actually reading what I'm writing.
And I am an engineer. Obviously you've never written nor read documentation.
You asked me about absolute truth, one of the most debated topics of all time. I gave you a TWENTY SECOND lecture on that incredibly complicated topic. You didn't even read it. If you had taken that twenty seconds, you probably wouldn't have had a problem with it, you would have gotten your answer, and it would have saved us both a lot of time.
Ah yes.
No. I am not one of "those people."
If you had taken twenty seconds to read my previous response you would know that. You would also understand why I think the question itself is flawed, at least by apparent intent.
What was the question again?