Trump told us he was going away at his speech at the Whirlpool factory in Ohio. "You might not see me for a while." Thanks to devolution, we know he left in place a plan to save America through this lunacy. We all 100% believe that he's coming back. Link to speech in comments.
(media.patriots.win)
🐸 IT HAD TO BE THIS WAY 🐸
I do NOT support Devolution. Why?
I believe that there are much safer speculated resolution than Devolution
In summary, the Devolution speculation is that there is maybe laws in place that will resolve all your life challenges. I do NOT believe that. Because if you look at the FACTS, the facts contradict Devolution. When I make a choice, if I can choose between FACTS and SPECULATION, I always choose FACTS. For example, right now, there are still laws being passed that are really bad for you. Those laws directly contradict Devolution. In other words, when there are conflicting information between facts and speculations, I usually choose facts. The facts do NOT support the Devolution speculation.
Because I believe that for citizens to have real security and real prosperity, the best strategy is for citizens to actively and peacefully resolve any challenges. For example, but not limited to, do your own research, listen to various opinions. Then make your own opinion. They make life choices based on YOUR own research. NOT on someone else research or someone else speculation.
One of the core speculation of Devolution is that citizen should be apathetic and inactive. So that speculated "laws" will magically solve all their life challenges. I believe the opposite. Thus, I do NOT support Devolution.
Do your research
Argyris and Schon (1974) suggest that individuals and organizations maintain theories of action that they have developed about and for themselves. Theories of action typically include an espoused theory of action and a theory-in-use. The “espoused theory of action...is the theory of action to which he [or she] gives allegiance, and which upon request, he [or she] communicates to others. However, the theory that actually governs his [or her] action is his [or her] theory-in-use, which may or may not be compatible with his [or her] espoused [publicly stated] theory; furthermore, the individual may or may not be aware of the incompatibility of the two theories.” (p.7).