What I found interesting is how Trump twice claimed out loud to be the one having ended the Nordstream.
Of course, it could be read as a matter of policy that started during the Trump admin.
On the other hand, taking credit for such a feat, as a matter of fact, may also point to something else. That indeed, certain areas are prohibited for Biden and his Admin to trespass on, so as not to enjoin the US military in a conflict directly. It shows the Biden admin to be window dressers.
There may be other reasons why he took credit in terms of effects on NATO as a whole.
What I found interesting is how Trump twice claimed out loud to be the one having ended the Nordstream.
Of course, it could be read as a matter of policy that started during the Trump admin.
On the other hand, taking credit for such a feat, as a matter of fact, may also point to something else. That indeed, certain areas are prohibited for Biden and his Admin to trespass on, so as not to enjoin the US military in a conflict directly. It shows the Biden admin to be window dressers.
There may be other reasons why he took credit in terms of effects on NATO as a whole.
The strategy of letting NATO send all the weaponry is to drain them of usable weaponry; the U.S. sending weaponry likely means refreshing the armory..