There is no law stating it one way or another. There are precedents.
The Page case had established that the Brady rule should be applicable to Grand Jury.
In the Williams case, the liberal SCOTUS blatantly overturned it, but the dissenting opinion has a lot of merits.
It's not a question of legality here. Its about perception. Indicting Trump is primarily PR task. They need to get the majority of the Lefties on their side, and passionately. The optics at present is really bad for them, so to come here screaming LEGALLY is pretty silly.
Its NOT silly. This post is the one making a mountain out of a mole-hill.
Which in turn is BAD OPTICS for this board, AND for Trump and the Right.
If this somehow gets to trial THEN it will look bad for the left.
Messing with a Grand Jury isn't a good look. Letting an out of control DA screw himself is a better strategy. Never stop the enemy when they are making a mistake.
First you claim LEGALITY. Now you completely drop that point and jump into "Let a out of control DA screw himself by letting them arest Trump"
And as far "Messing with a Grand Jury", nice try again. Exposing an out of control DA is not messing with a Grand Jury.
You are exposing the clear mindset of how the Leftists think. They want to put Trump in prison, no matter what, no matter how badly they do it, because you know what they are secretly hoping for? Once Trump is in their custody, they are hoping some deranged TDS nut will assassinate him.
You are shilling for the most evil Lefty wet dreams. You should be ashamed of yourself.
This is BS.
A DA is not LEGALLY obligated to show exculpatory evidence to a GRAND JURY.
In a regular trial, yes, that is required. But, NOT for a grand jury.
Nothing. NOTHING... to see here.
There is no law stating it one way or another. There are precedents.
The Page case had established that the Brady rule should be applicable to Grand Jury.
In the Williams case, the liberal SCOTUS blatantly overturned it, but the dissenting opinion has a lot of merits.
It's not a question of legality here. Its about perception. Indicting Trump is primarily PR task. They need to get the majority of the Lefties on their side, and passionately. The optics at present is really bad for them, so to come here screaming LEGALLY is pretty silly.
Its NOT silly. This post is the one making a mountain out of a mole-hill.
Which in turn is BAD OPTICS for this board, AND for Trump and the Right.
If this somehow gets to trial THEN it will look bad for the left.
Messing with a Grand Jury isn't a good look. Letting an out of control DA screw himself is a better strategy. Never stop the enemy when they are making a mistake.
First you claim LEGALITY. Now you completely drop that point and jump into "Let a out of control DA screw himself by letting them arest Trump"
And as far "Messing with a Grand Jury", nice try again. Exposing an out of control DA is not messing with a Grand Jury.
You are exposing the clear mindset of how the Leftists think. They want to put Trump in prison, no matter what, no matter how badly they do it, because you know what they are secretly hoping for? Once Trump is in their custody, they are hoping some deranged TDS nut will assassinate him.
You are shilling for the most evil Lefty wet dreams. You should be ashamed of yourself.