You haven't studied. Origin is MIT. MIT high compromise level. Many other coins have no sti k and you know original owners and majority owners. BTC came out and i heard of it first by less than reputable people from MIT when living there in 2010
So prove to me i am wrong. I know people from 2010 days and distro patterns, i feel comfy woth my statement.
You have absolutely no sources that the Bitcoin came from MIT.
You tell me I haven't studied but you are not providing any sources. This is fucking stupid if you are trying to rightly convince people but an obvious tactic for manipulating people with fear.
There's already been several court cases in favor of Bitcoin specifically. It would be a huge headache for the Federal Govt to undo the precedence set by Bitcoin. However, precedence hasn't been set for crypto other than Bitcoin.
With the RESTRICT Act going through congress, they'd be able to outlaw Bitcoin and Crypto in the blink of an eye. Congressional Law overrules judge precedence buy it has to be passed in a subtle way so the public doesn't notice.
Surprised more people aren’t talking about this. I have invested thousands into crypto, however.. I can’t help but feel like something seems completely off lately. Does anyone know how much Btc the US government is currently holding?
I’m sure they would be able to manipulate the markets.
Here’s what really confuses me. They continue to destroy the dollar. It seems as if they really don’t care. Which is driving a lot of new people to buy bitcoin at a very high price… I just feel like we’re going to be blind-sided. I refuse to sell my bitcoin, but I’m also not buying anymore, been awhile now.
Worst case scenario, if I lose my bitcoin.. I’m still fine but I don’t see cbdc and bitcoin working in harmony. (They can, Ofcourse but I don’t see our government allowing that to happen)
There's nowhere in this link that this guy was involved with MIT in any way...
Just because he lived in Massachusetts doesn't mean he was with MIT... You're gonna have to find some better sources than that.
Also him founding the Bitcoin Foundation doesn't change the fact that the code is open source for you and me to read and audited by many people. If anyone could find a security flaw in Bitcoin, they would've done so with a huge payday... To date the Bitcoin network has not been hacked/decrypted and peoples Bitcoin stolen.
I've never mentioned a security flaw. The size of the community in crypto in 2009 was nearly zero. Most of these projects came out of investments from DARPA or other big Tech companies, most went into Harvard and mit, just go take a look at early people and their connections, and my worry has to do with when you go down those connection chains there are lots of people like Epstein and Wexler
Several people have done deep dives. Documents show the group who created it. Then it is a guess and conjecture what happens for specific holders. Enough points toward early adoptors and walk tracks through epstein connections and end at ftx to make one wonder about full origin story. Just search or ignore me. XRP people and some silver bugs have covered it.
You haven't studied. Origin is MIT. MIT high compromise level. Many other coins have no sti k and you know original owners and majority owners. BTC came out and i heard of it first by less than reputable people from MIT when living there in 2010
So prove to me i am wrong. I know people from 2010 days and distro patterns, i feel comfy woth my statement.
You have absolutely no sources that the Bitcoin came from MIT.
You tell me I haven't studied but you are not providing any sources. This is fucking stupid if you are trying to rightly convince people but an obvious tactic for manipulating people with fear.
Provid sources no MIT connection.
The burden of proof is on you, not me. I'm not making the claim that Bitcoin was made by MIT, you are.
I have a suspicion you are Fed anyway.
There's already been several court cases in favor of Bitcoin specifically. It would be a huge headache for the Federal Govt to undo the precedence set by Bitcoin. However, precedence hasn't been set for crypto other than Bitcoin.
With the RESTRICT Act going through congress, they'd be able to outlaw Bitcoin and Crypto in the blink of an eye. Congressional Law overrules judge precedence buy it has to be passed in a subtle way so the public doesn't notice.
https://nitter.nl/LPMisesCaucus/status/1639934790026555394
https://nitter.nl/greg_price11/status/1640722365809147905
Surprised more people aren’t talking about this. I have invested thousands into crypto, however.. I can’t help but feel like something seems completely off lately. Does anyone know how much Btc the US government is currently holding?
I’m sure they would be able to manipulate the markets.
Here’s what really confuses me. They continue to destroy the dollar. It seems as if they really don’t care. Which is driving a lot of new people to buy bitcoin at a very high price… I just feel like we’re going to be blind-sided. I refuse to sell my bitcoin, but I’m also not buying anymore, been awhile now.
Worst case scenario, if I lose my bitcoin.. I’m still fine but I don’t see cbdc and bitcoin working in harmony. (They can, Ofcourse but I don’t see our government allowing that to happen)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Andresen Interestin, right up the road in Amherst is this guy.
There's nowhere in this link that this guy was involved with MIT in any way...
Just because he lived in Massachusetts doesn't mean he was with MIT... You're gonna have to find some better sources than that.
Also him founding the Bitcoin Foundation doesn't change the fact that the code is open source for you and me to read and audited by many people. If anyone could find a security flaw in Bitcoin, they would've done so with a huge payday... To date the Bitcoin network has not been hacked/decrypted and peoples Bitcoin stolen.
I've never mentioned a security flaw. The size of the community in crypto in 2009 was nearly zero. Most of these projects came out of investments from DARPA or other big Tech companies, most went into Harvard and mit, just go take a look at early people and their connections, and my worry has to do with when you go down those connection chains there are lots of people like Epstein and Wexler
Several people have done deep dives. Documents show the group who created it. Then it is a guess and conjecture what happens for specific holders. Enough points toward early adoptors and walk tracks through epstein connections and end at ftx to make one wonder about full origin story. Just search or ignore me. XRP people and some silver bugs have covered it.
Give a source, Fed.
I thought some guy named asashi invented Bitcoin.
Satoshi Nakamoto is the pseudonym
Group. Not person.