Yes you’re right. I find it amusing when the left tries to steal our lines.
White people (less than 9% of world population) used to talk about racism against whites, but the retarded left said that only whites can be racist, so whites stopped using the term “racist” and went with the simpler “antiwhite”. In a lecture at Catholic University about “ending White Christian America”, a black lesbian “reverend” asks, “Is Christian faith possible apart from anti-Blackness?” If she already thought she had the definition of “racist” locked down for her subjective use, then why does she need “antiblack”? Seems like she’s covetous of our coinage of “antiwhite”.
Yes you’re right. I find it amusing when the left tries to steal our lines.
White people (less than 9% of world population) used to talk about racism against whites, but the retarded left said that only whites can be racist, so whites stopped using the term “racist” and went with the simpler “antiwhite”. In a lecture at Catholic University about “ending White Christian America”, a black lesbian “reverend” asks, “Is Christian faith possible apart from anti-Blackness?” If she already thought she had the definition of “racist” locked down for her subjective use, then why does she need “antiblack”? Seems like she’s covetous of our coinage of “antiwhite”.