Which doesn't change the fact that the numerals 666 were never used in the Bible and therefore inversion to 999 makes no Biblical sense. You don't seem to understand the distinction between "math" and numerical systems. Welcome to computation using Roman numbers.
But once you're done, could you at least TRY to argue my original point, in stead of using the same tired forum sliding techniques? It gets old after a few decades...
I made my point several times and you are not responding to it at all. You cited the flip of 999 to 666. I have pointed out that it is only a numerical coincidence that would have no meaning in the numeric system present in the days of the Bible. You haven't contradicted that at all.
As for Gematria, have fun. I prefer a Ouija board.
Which doesn't change the fact that the numerals 666 were never used in the Bible and therefore inversion to 999 makes no Biblical sense. You don't seem to understand the distinction between "math" and numerical systems. Welcome to computation using Roman numbers.
Why don't you check it out for yourself in the original Greek?
https://www.abarim-publications.com/Interlinear-New-Testament/Revelation/Revelation-13-parsed.html
But once you're done, could you at least TRY to argue my original point, in stead of using the same tired forum sliding techniques? It gets old after a few decades...
I made my point several times and you are not responding to it at all. You cited the flip of 999 to 666. I have pointed out that it is only a numerical coincidence that would have no meaning in the numeric system present in the days of the Bible. You haven't contradicted that at all.
As for Gematria, have fun. I prefer a Ouija board.