The thing is, with Kubrick (and this is of course often the case with literature/film/etc in general, at least of quality) he's dealing with stuff at multiple levels. On the surface yes your analysis is the standard one. In the context of what we now know much more about than then, as well as his larger body of work, it's obvious there's more than one meaning here. When that came out could he have done a movie about mind controlled slaves? What happened to him when, much later, he did a movie explicitly (if only showing a small, relatively palatable - adult orgy - outer layer of it) exposing the occult elite?
The thing is, with Kubrick (and this is of course often the case with literature/film/etc in general, at least of quality) he's dealing with stuff at multiple levels. On the surface yes your analysis is the standard one. In the context of what we now know much more about than then, as well as his larger body of work, it's obvious there's more than one meaning here. When that came out could he have done a movie about mind controlled slaves? What happened to him when, much later, he did a movie explicitly (if only showing a small, relatively palatable - adult orgy - outer layer of it) exposing the occult elite?