The MOST important aspect of this is that the precedent has now been set so that Obama, Bush, Clinton, and ANYONE in their Administrations can now be indicted and prosecuted. Let the unsealings begin!!!!
No doubt, but IMHO this case will never be prosecuted. One reason is that it doesn't rise to the standard needed to prevent Trump from running. It's a "manufactured felony" created from misdemeanors. But yes, judges will be removed/tried/executed by military tribunals. Per Q, "Military is the ONLY way".
I was referring to the precedent set, and indicting the real criminals.
I have no idea how Trump's case will play out. It's clear the DS cares nothing about law and justice. And maybe we need to see this play out further. Too many lefties are convinced Trump is a criminal because he didn't support their narrative and the MSM told them so.
At this point I'm not convinced 5% - 7% are hopelessly lost. I think it's at least double that, if not triple. I think Q gave us 5% - 7% so we wouldn't give up too quickly on the 30% - 40% who would be slow to come around to the truth.
I was a jury foreman on a wrongful death trial - head on, person who died was in the wrong lane - I was shocked to even make it on to the jury (grilled pretty hard by both sides). Anyway, we had 3 people who felt the family should get some sort of payout no matter who's fault it was (stick it to the insurance company). The poor driver who survived and clearly wasn't at fault had gone through years of suffering up to that trial, and the family's scumbag lawyer wasn't making it any easier.
Fortunately, we were able to convince them that the person who died was clearly in the wrong lane and caused the accident, the first sticking point (thanks to the ambulance chasing scumbag), and then get them to put themselves into that situation and admit that they would feel horrible being told they were partially at fault for being there going about their normal business.
We also had to come up with a $ value of the income lost due to the death, which was quite challenging due to the deceased spotty work history. We assumed the recent history was a sign of positive change, and with insurance and what-not, rung up a nice $500K value, which the judge said would make the family feel better. Hmmm, ok....that's nice....
Put those same people on a jury where capital punishment is involved, and I don't think you'll even get so much as a slap on the wrist out of them.
That's one reason why this is getting dragged out. The swamp creatures keep committing new crimes to cover their sick asses, and the patriots keeping logging more evidence and new crimes along the way. The stolen elections are recent, with 2020 being the big steal and Jan 6th the big coverup, so I would think we are getting close to hammer time.
Thanks for the comment. Also, when I posted the question I forgot that there are longer statutes of limitations for more serious crimes (e.g. Insert the Swamp here.)
So, I'm thinking Trumps arrest is what shocks people, but those that follow after this precedence is set are REALLY going to SHOCK the world.
The MOST important aspect of this is that the precedent has now been set so that Obama, Bush, Clinton, and ANYONE in their Administrations can now be indicted and prosecuted. Let the unsealings begin!!!!
Indicted
Prosecuted is going to depend on removing judges and juries who've decided the outcome before they even hear the charges or see the evidence.
No doubt, but IMHO this case will never be prosecuted. One reason is that it doesn't rise to the standard needed to prevent Trump from running. It's a "manufactured felony" created from misdemeanors. But yes, judges will be removed/tried/executed by military tribunals. Per Q, "Military is the ONLY way".
I was referring to the precedent set, and indicting the real criminals.
I have no idea how Trump's case will play out. It's clear the DS cares nothing about law and justice. And maybe we need to see this play out further. Too many lefties are convinced Trump is a criminal because he didn't support their narrative and the MSM told them so.
At this point I'm not convinced 5% - 7% are hopelessly lost. I think it's at least double that, if not triple. I think Q gave us 5% - 7% so we wouldn't give up too quickly on the 30% - 40% who would be slow to come around to the truth.
I think the higher level people will require Military courts based on their crimes of TREASON.
Absolutely.
I was a jury foreman on a wrongful death trial - head on, person who died was in the wrong lane - I was shocked to even make it on to the jury (grilled pretty hard by both sides). Anyway, we had 3 people who felt the family should get some sort of payout no matter who's fault it was (stick it to the insurance company). The poor driver who survived and clearly wasn't at fault had gone through years of suffering up to that trial, and the family's scumbag lawyer wasn't making it any easier.
Fortunately, we were able to convince them that the person who died was clearly in the wrong lane and caused the accident, the first sticking point (thanks to the ambulance chasing scumbag), and then get them to put themselves into that situation and admit that they would feel horrible being told they were partially at fault for being there going about their normal business.
We also had to come up with a $ value of the income lost due to the death, which was quite challenging due to the deceased spotty work history. We assumed the recent history was a sign of positive change, and with insurance and what-not, rung up a nice $500K value, which the judge said would make the family feel better. Hmmm, ok....that's nice....
Put those same people on a jury where capital punishment is involved, and I don't think you'll even get so much as a slap on the wrist out of them.
What about the statutes of limitations?
That's one reason why this is getting dragged out. The swamp creatures keep committing new crimes to cover their sick asses, and the patriots keeping logging more evidence and new crimes along the way. The stolen elections are recent, with 2020 being the big steal and Jan 6th the big coverup, so I would think we are getting close to hammer time.
Thanks for the comment. Also, when I posted the question I forgot that there are longer statutes of limitations for more serious crimes (e.g. Insert the Swamp here.)
So, I'm thinking Trumps arrest is what shocks people, but those that follow after this precedence is set are REALLY going to SHOCK the world.