Whether it is illegal or not - or the threshold is so low, here is my take:
In a court of law, would this pass the requirements to put someone behind bars? No. You call an individual specialist to confirm signatures. There are not enough specialists in the world.
This further pushes the needs for requirements for in-person with-ID voting only.
Well let’s see if this gets traction. The DS/Cartel union seems to have infiltrated deep into AZ and it’s been a long time. Pray for Kari Lake and the other patriots to be successful in exposing the swamp creatures!
I would still fail signature verification. I've never been able to hone in on one signature, despite 20 years of effort. It's so bad. I could sign it 100 times in a row and no two would be similar.
This is actually another brilliantly evil move by the Democrats. By outsourcing this to a third party, it gives Maricopa plausible deniability. If this DOES see the inside of a courtroom, which I highly doubt, Maricopa can say “I didn’t know. My bad. We’ll clean it up for next time. Promise.” And that will be the end of it. Meanwhile, Hobbs will destroy Arizona.
You know they'll sing a different tune when the time comes to recall the Hobbsgoblin and TPTB feel compelled to exclude a vast amount of signatures on the recall petition.
Disgusting.
Whether it is illegal or not - or the threshold is so low, here is my take:
In a court of law, would this pass the requirements to put someone behind bars? No. You call an individual specialist to confirm signatures. There are not enough specialists in the world.
This further pushes the needs for requirements for in-person with-ID voting only.
Well let’s see if this gets traction. The DS/Cartel union seems to have infiltrated deep into AZ and it’s been a long time. Pray for Kari Lake and the other patriots to be successful in exposing the swamp creatures!
I would still fail signature verification. I've never been able to hone in on one signature, despite 20 years of effort. It's so bad. I could sign it 100 times in a row and no two would be similar.
Our bank accepts me signing my husband's name along with his signature too. No one bats an eye.
I wasn't a signatory at my company but I wrote checks for years. Nobody noticed until I signed a check for over $1000, and then all hell broke loose.
So now I'm a signatory.
Same. The signature they use to verify against is the one on my driver's license, which I think is at least 5 years old at this point.
This is actually another brilliantly evil move by the Democrats. By outsourcing this to a third party, it gives Maricopa plausible deniability. If this DOES see the inside of a courtroom, which I highly doubt, Maricopa can say “I didn’t know. My bad. We’ll clean it up for next time. Promise.” And that will be the end of it. Meanwhile, Hobbs will destroy Arizona.
You know they'll sing a different tune when the time comes to recall the Hobbsgoblin and TPTB feel compelled to exclude a vast amount of signatures on the recall petition.
Signatures are an outdated way to verify identity. Every signature varies and they're fairly easy to forge using modern technology.
Runbeck again, and again, and again, and...
BOOM!!!!!