video: https://youtu.be/dmrxD0WKn-Y
Fuck this bullshit. If it's illegal on the street, it's illegal online. Case closed end of story, no more censorship fight PERIOD.
Repeal the entire CDA. This law is basically a way of solving the problem of illegal content online, by making another problem. This law is unconstitutional at it's core. Here is how this issue should be handled:
If a user on a forum, app, or whatever posts illegal content, the webmaster must give away their IP address and any other info they have (email, username, phone number etc) to the proper cyber crimes division of law enforcement in their state. (if the user is behind a VPN etc then law enforcement must contact the VPN for the info! Yes they must! If foreign VPN wont divulge, then the issue must eventually rise to the level of compromising diplomatic relations with that country!)
If others discover the illegal content before the webmaster, they can report it to the police themselves, and the police would then have to contact the webmaster for the info. If needed, search warrants can be executed on webmasters who refuse to hand it over. If webmasters cannot be located then the web hosting provider should be contacted and asked for the webmaster's info. It just moves up the chain like anything else. Simple, constitutional, and eliminated the entire murk of bullshit caused by the CDA.
If a user on a forum, app or whatever posts content that the webmaster doesn't want on their site, it's the same as if someone in a store or bar says something the owner doesnt like. There are certain things that a store owner cannot refuse you service over, such as your political views, and other things that they can, such as you cursing out the clerk / other customers.
This whole thing has been purposefully confused and muddied by globohomo but in reality it is literally NO DIFFERENT than being on the street in public, with all the different websites being like different businesses. Other countries will have to figure out their own shit but WE have the Constitution. And if a user posts illegal content from another country, our law enforcement should contact theirs about it. And perhaps we could work something out! *edit: see WTFsocialismreally's comment below!
Oh, and if having sex in public is illegal, it's illegal on the internet. If whore houses are illegal, porn sites are illegal. If prostitution is illegal, onlyfans and cam whores are illegal. Poof, problem fucking solved LAWFULLY, clean and swift. Bye bye
The Constitution doesn't say anything about any of the things you are calling "illegal." The things you are calling illegal are illegal because of other laws. For example, sex in public is not addressed at all in the Constitution, nor should it be. Child molestation isn't addressed in the Constitution, nor should it be. It is not up to a Centralized Authority to address these issues. That is up to the people who it affects. The entire concept of ruling through a Centralized Authority for "the greater good" is The Lie that the Cabal uses to rule the whole world. They offer up their "good Rulers" and their "bad Rulers" to perpetuate the Grand Illusion, all the while they pull all the strings through the Centralized Authority they created.
The problem with the CDA is not that it allows Corporations to bypass laws that affect people in "the real world", the problem is in relying on a Centralized Authority to be addressing these things at all.
The Constitution was a Treaty between Sovereign States (where a "State" is itself problematic, but that's a larger scope of the problem). It was designed to address trade between States and to "provide for the common defense". I suggest that that in itself is problematic (again, a larger scope), but it gives an appreciation for what the Constitution is, and what it is not.
All of the amendments to the Constitution are ALL fuckery. There is SO MUCH FUCKERY in the Constitutional amendments it's ludicrous. I have spoken on this many times and won't belabor it here, but when people demand that the Centralized Authority should be doing "this" or "that" or that "such and such is unConstitutional" I just shake my head. That is what the Cabal wants you to think. That is the design of the Controlled Opposition of the system.
People think, "Let's get the Centralized Authority to address this issue the right way, so that my local life is correctly addressed."
This is impossible. If you, or someone you know are personally affected by a direct violation of someone's inalienable Rights, your locality should be addressing the issue. You and your neighbors should be the ones discussing what so and so did to someone's daughter, NOT the Centralized Authority. If people take responsibility for their own environment, and protect their own, the Centralized Authority won't be able to commit fuckery. By putting the power into the hands of "the ruler," you automatically lose, every time. This is the Great Fraud.
With regards to "our democracy," the real problem is not where the left and the right disagree, the real problem is where they agree. Everyone agrees that the Centralized Authority should retain the power "for the greater good". THAT is the fraud.
this has my mind working close to the metal. I'm saving this comment to study on
I don't see any of the faults you are claiming being in the OP....