I have an eerie premonition that the 'related crime' is what special counsel Jack Smith is going to charge Trump with. I tend to think the Mar-a-Lago 'confidential' document allegations is a distraction to what Jack Smith is putting his effort into.
Why is Jack Smith investigating J6 by subpoenaing former VP Mike Pence and officials in all 7 states targeted by Trump allies in 2020 election?
Bragg is making the claim that Trump interfered in the 2020 election. In Georgia, we are seeing the same with the grand jury investigation there.
Do you see it? This is the reason why DA Bragg did not list the basis for the 34 felonies Trump was charged with. It hasn't been announced yet by special counsel Jack Smith. I pray Trump's team is recognizing this.
That’s not how it works. It would have to be a crime that he is committing and trying to cover up before or at the same time as the 34 charges. It can’t be a crime that occurs five or six years later.
Is this from a legal expert or is that your heart-felt feeling about this? Can you answer why Bragg hasn't revealed the related crime? It has to be a federal crime. Trump isn't charged with any federal crime that we know of. Is it a sealed indictment? There has to be an answer to this. If it is a sealed indictment, then how is Bragg privy to it?
I wouldn’t have said it if it was a heart felt opinion. Go watch Alan D on war room this morning.
Either did I. I was just posing the question whether you had legal knowledge on this. Dershowitz also just said Trump would be convicted but would win on appeal. That's not good.
“The jury could … convict defendant of falsifying business records if the jury concluded that defendant had the intent to commit or conceal another crime, even if she was not convicted of the other crime” In plain English, what these cases held is that prosecutors don’t have to convict someone for the necessary second crime. They only have to prove there was an INTENT to “commit or conceal” the second crime. It’s a thin distinction, but there it is. As I said he couldn’t have been “falsifying business records” with intent to commit or conceal the document bullshit 5 years later. That’s now how it works.
Agreed. You're thinking rationally, but this is not a rational court. How did the truth and facts help the J6 victims of the DC kangaroo court? NYC = DC. This court has to end before it gets started. I hope Trump has lawyers that will end it. If he appeals to a higher court it putatively is still in State Court. Some how I think this has to be a SCOTUS decision or at the Federal level.
when his handlers tell him he will let us know...lol....what a fool
Why do say this?
because they are trying to manufacture the whole thing..
This is a Lego-lawfare operation. Manufacturing Lego pieces is what lawfare is. The question is how will it be stopped before all the pieces are set in place?
when they build a building with no foundation the whole thing falls apart just like this case will
Except this is a Soviet-style Show trial. When has a foundation ever been necessary when 'truth' is not the prevailing fact, but instead the weaponized law? People keep underestimating how corrupt the court system is. There is no 'fairness' in court. It is absolutely weaponized and corrupt. Most people haven't experienced court outside of perhaps challenging a traffic ticket. Yet, everyday thousands of people experience what a kangaroo court is and are shell-shocked by what just occurred to them in court. Everyday lives and careers are ruined. Most of these are good, upright, and decent people too.
and thats why we here are fighting our asses off to change it.........
Please let TRUMP and his lawyers handle it - TRUMP is 10 steps ahead of these goons !!
This is a discussion forum.... We know insiders read the material here. Thus, presenting information is indeed important for discussion purposes. I'd like to know what the 'related charge' is and how an indictment is allowable without the lynch pin 'related charge' not being sourced and named? Inquiring minds would like to know.
Here are some lawyer-written points about the bogus charges:
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/double-intent-wednesday-april-5-2023
Forget proving the intent. Bragg believes he'll have the jury to do that. From the get-go this has been a kangaroo court. The jury is not going to be favorable to Trump, just as the Judge in this case is highly conflicted. How's the J6 defendants doing? DC= NYC.
The key to this trial is attacking the unnamed 'related charge'. The NY law is unconstitutional.