I hate this thought
🤔💭 Theory 😲💡
What if at some point in the trial the judge comes up with some justification to say Trump cannot be prosecuted because he was a former President, thus giving precedent to protections for Biden and Obama and the other crooks?
Ok, maybe Im over simplifying the idea. My fear is that the judge will throw the case out and mention that Trump is former pres. Then the idea takes hold that the case was thrown out BECAUSE he was a former pres (by msm and democrats). Another judge then rules on future case against Biden that there is precent for the case to be tossed. Judges can get away with things if there is no public outcry.
District court cases basically aren’t precedential in our legal system. Some states like Minnesota outright say as much. Only courts of appeals or state supreme courts are binding precedent. What a district court judge does or doesn’t do is not really consequential as far as creating precedent goes in the legal system.