5
Afropick07 5 points ago +7 / -2

I dont think any Christians are saying “Kill them all”. I know if windsor were shooting rockets into Detroit, id require the US gov to take care of that. Not that everyone has to die, but they can no longer operate under a separate government. The Hamas of windsor would be toast.

1
Afropick07 1 point ago +2 / -1

Israels gotta so their thing but we dont have to help. Same with Russia. Let those two countries do what needs to be done and lets stay out of it.

1
Afropick07 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wouldnt say ungovernable. They are told the armies of the world guard Antarctica and so they will never find out whats behind that great ice wall. Thats like a parent saying theres a monster under the bed so their kid doesnt get out of bed at night.

1
Afropick07 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gravity is just a tendency all mass has to be attracted to mass. Dont think of water as being level, think of it as being equidistant from the center of mass of the earth. The scale of earth is so big, its like making a circle in AutoCAD and zooming in on the outside of the circle that it appears to be a straight line.

0
Afropick07 0 points ago +1 / -1

They need to do this though. The whole gaza strip thing didnt work. Hamas kept building tunnels and shooting rockets. If Windsor were doing this to Detroit, the government would owe it to the citizens of Detroit to keep them safe. It sucks and I dont think US should support it, but I dont think the US should stand in their way either.

3
Afropick07 3 points ago +3 / -0

It seems you dont have any problems with researching. You provided a lot of good stuff! I always feel awkward suggesting treatment options but you may also want to research fasting. Specifically triggering autophagy through fasting. I will also pray for you and him.

2
Afropick07 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have you looked into refraction? I think thats a very easy thing for globe earthers to answer with. I think the thing that flat earthers would have to explain is, why would the object ever not be visible. Meaning, refraction explains why an object would sometimes be visible around the curve of the earth, for instance southern michigan dunes can sometimes see the tops of buildings in Chicago. What flat earthers would then have to explain is, why the bottoms of the buildings were not visible and why Chicago is not always visible with clear skies.

0
Afropick07 0 points ago +1 / -1

Okay, you dont need to call it vacuum if that confuses you. Call it 0 psi. Imagine a tall cylinder, open top. Do you agree that the pressure in the cylinder will be greater at the bottom of the cylinder than at the top? This is because air has weight, like every other material. Wait though, why doesnt the air get sucked out the top of the container? Considering the air at the top is at a lower psi than the air at the bottom of the container.

1
Afropick07 1 point ago +1 / -0

Try searching this „winter solstice constellations summer“. Brings up diagrams that you can then test against.

2
Afropick07 2 points ago +2 / -0

They make that plane argument but then never consider, well if the earth is flat, in order to fly „around-the-globe“ the pilot would have to constantly turn the plane a little to the north. Its funny that they think altitude is calculated by a tangential line from where the plane originally took off.

1
Afropick07 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hell, if it's flat you should be able to see the opposite shore of the great lakes with a telescope on a clear day even.

Well, you can sometimes if the weather is right. Due to refraction. The real issue is then why cant you always see Chicago from the dunes in lower Michigan and why can you only see the tops of the buildings not the bottoms.

1
Afropick07 1 point ago +1 / -0

What are the few compelling anomalies?

2
Afropick07 2 points ago +2 / -0

You really dont know? Do you have any reason to believe that radiation at a distance would be the same as at the source? This should be a point of common sense. Dont say you have common sense if you think radiation from a point source could be the same at a distance away from the source of the radiation as it is AT the source.

3
Afropick07 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do you think radiation is what kills you at the sun? Do you think the maybe the radiation would be less at a great distance from the sun?

3
Afropick07 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also. Light does bend. Depending on conditions, it curves more or less. The question you would then have to answer is not whether something far away can be seen, but why would it ever not be seen? For example, Chicago skyline can sometimes be seen across Lake Michigan from on top of sand dunes but only the upper parts of the buildings. If flat, why wouldnt the lower halves of the building always be visible with the top halves?

3
Afropick07 3 points ago +3 / -0

In unrelated news, 66,000 young women have died due to rusty hangers shoved up their… Wait, that didn‘t happen?

1
Afropick07 1 point ago +1 / -0

How are lemons and limes alkaline? Citric ACID? Am I grossly mistaken?

view more: Next ›