100% agree if you are unvaxxed you still have a lot to be greatful for even IF this article is true.
But about your take -- the push for vax, if this article is true, probably WAS required because in order for nearly 100% population coverage you'd need enough vaxxed that almost every unvaxxed person would eventually spend enough time around the vaxxed to spread. If enough people DON'T get it, there would inevitably be pockets of people who don't even come into any significant vaxxed and thus wouldn't get whatever transference is going on here. Just speaking theoretically not sure I have an opinion yet on spread to unvaxxed.
100% agree if you are unvaxxed you still have a lot to be greatful for even IF this article is true.
But about your take -- the push for vax, if this article is true, probably WAS required because in order for nearly 100% population coverage you'd need enough vaxxed that almost every unvaxxed person would eventually spend enough time around the vaxxed to spread. If enough people DON'T get it, there would inevitably be pockets of people who don't even come into any significant vaxxed and thus wouldn't get whatever transference is going on here. Just speaking theoretically not sure I have an opinion yet on spread to unvaxxed.
That is fair.