No cliches being thrown here. You devolve to name-calling to more than just myself when your version of events is questioned. I'm not calling you anything other than worked up. But you are doing the classic citing MSM, which we have seen time and again to be wrong. Why did they not mention some vital piece of information? Because they're the MSM and they don't care about facts. We do, but we get them first and examine possibilities beyond our knee-jerk reaction.
No cliches being thrown here. You devolve to name-calling to more than just myself when your version of events is questioned. I'm not calling you anything other than worked up. But you are doing the classic citing MSM, which we have seen time and again to be wrong. Why did they not mention some vital piece of information? Because they're the MSM and they don't care about facts. We do, but we get them first and examine possibilities beyond our knee-jerk reaction.