He's spewed anti-2A rhetoric after school shootings- knowing they're false flags and living through the playbook.
He is just another paid actor. I'm tired of these yutzes.
He is shilling for germ theory even as he "exposes" vaccines. His position is that they're not sufficiently tested or tracked- which is true. But whether they are necessary at all is the real question, and he doesn't even attempt to touch the scam that is the germ and viral theory of illness. He is fervently asking the WRONG QUESTIONS, directing people away from the fundamental understanding of how our health actually works and toward Rockefeller-funded mainstream/allopathic medicine.
Kennedy is the controlled opposition to vaccines- one side says "status quo", the other side says "test and track". But both operate on the premise that vaccines actually do anything at all.
There is no such thing as a contagious virus, let alone one that is the product of "gain of function research". There has never been a paper or experiment published that definitively proves any virus is the cause of any disease. This sounds like an insane position- but don't take my word for it. Viruses are not what they tell us. Tiny external virus particles don't "infect us"- if they did, things like masks would work... and they obviously don't do anything, and in most cases they make things worse.
My understanding is the rabies virus specifically attacks nerve cells. They replicate until they get to the brain. The brain swells, the patient goes into a coma and usually dies. Once it gets that far, the survival rate is very low.
Sorry, I meant how does it work in his scenario if virii aren't real...like what is rabies then and why can you catch it from being bitten if there are no viruses
He's spewed anti-2A rhetoric after school shootings- knowing they're false flags and living through the playbook.
He is just another paid actor. I'm tired of these yutzes.
He is shilling for germ theory even as he "exposes" vaccines. His position is that they're not sufficiently tested or tracked- which is true. But whether they are necessary at all is the real question, and he doesn't even attempt to touch the scam that is the germ and viral theory of illness. He is fervently asking the WRONG QUESTIONS, directing people away from the fundamental understanding of how our health actually works and toward Rockefeller-funded mainstream/allopathic medicine.
Kennedy is the controlled opposition to vaccines- one side says "status quo", the other side says "test and track". But both operate on the premise that vaccines actually do anything at all.
There is no such thing as a contagious virus, let alone one that is the product of "gain of function research". There has never been a paper or experiment published that definitively proves any virus is the cause of any disease. This sounds like an insane position- but don't take my word for it. Viruses are not what they tell us. Tiny external virus particles don't "infect us"- if they did, things like masks would work... and they obviously don't do anything, and in most cases they make things worse.
How does rabies work then? Serious question and not being oppositional here.
My understanding is the rabies virus specifically attacks nerve cells. They replicate until they get to the brain. The brain swells, the patient goes into a coma and usually dies. Once it gets that far, the survival rate is very low.
Sorry, I meant how does it work in his scenario if virii aren't real...like what is rabies then and why can you catch it from being bitten if there are no viruses
Oh, I understand now what you were asking. Don't have an answer for that!