Interesting observations from World Vaccine Conference in link.
Most medical professionals look to the recommendations of those above them in authority. They question nothing.
And with lower standards for degrees and the woke paradigm of care medical students are indoctrinated with these days, there's little hope of them having an original thought to question anything until they have at least a decade under their belts...if they're even smart enough to see through the game in the first place. That truly scares me.
Engineers also are forced to work in the real world with its harsh mistress. But when covid rolled around, so many engineers failed, or even refused to apply, those skills to a domain not their own. They eagerly donned masks, and rolled up their sleeves for the jab. It was really sad to witness.
Sheep? More like retards. You give them a sheet of paper that says "intentionally left blank", and they happily shove that shit into people without thinking.
Read a piece recently that stated most articles submitted to medical journals were rarely questioned or contradicted. This MD claimed that many studies/articles now are often questioned/contradicted with other results/outcomes. His point is that “science has become subjective “ and lacking in thorough objectivity and testing.
Pharma whores. Wholly owned by large corporate hospital chains. And led by a buncha DEI disciples.
Medicine’s out in the yard/the woods. Everything else is 100% leveraged AGAINST the patient!
I mean, how do you KNOW you needed all that radiation every frickin year for “wellness (mammograms)? How do YOU know? YOU don’t. You trust. How many blasts before you “SURPRISE” have breast cancer? Re-read my first sentence again.
I have the occasion to look up a subject from med journals to 'teach' my doctor as to why I'm on a certain medication. As I read various studies I can see some clinical trials were not conducted properly. I used to work at a large university school of medicine where all residents had to conduct a Human Use study through the NIH approval. I saw those studies from original abstract to completion and publication. If I can see the discrepancies in the published trials, why can't the doctors reading the journal? They just don't think anymore.
Interesting observations from World Vaccine Conference in link.
Most medical professionals look to the recommendations of those above them in authority. They question nothing.
And with lower standards for degrees and the woke paradigm of care medical students are indoctrinated with these days, there's little hope of them having an original thought to question anything until they have at least a decade under their belts...if they're even smart enough to see through the game in the first place. That truly scares me.
I worked at a hospital that had many medical students. The first time I spotted a male med student with a man bun, I knew we were in trouble.
Engineers also are forced to work in the real world with its harsh mistress. But when covid rolled around, so many engineers failed, or even refused to apply, those skills to a domain not their own. They eagerly donned masks, and rolled up their sleeves for the jab. It was really sad to witness.
Sheep? More like retards. You give them a sheet of paper that says "intentionally left blank", and they happily shove that shit into people without thinking.
Read a piece recently that stated most articles submitted to medical journals were rarely questioned or contradicted. This MD claimed that many studies/articles now are often questioned/contradicted with other results/outcomes. His point is that “science has become subjective “ and lacking in thorough objectivity and testing.
Self preservation is the ugliest human trait. The medical community is the worst offender.
Pharma whores. Wholly owned by large corporate hospital chains. And led by a buncha DEI disciples.
Medicine’s out in the yard/the woods. Everything else is 100% leveraged AGAINST the patient!
I mean, how do you KNOW you needed all that radiation every frickin year for “wellness (mammograms)? How do YOU know? YOU don’t. You trust. How many blasts before you “SURPRISE” have breast cancer? Re-read my first sentence again.
I have the occasion to look up a subject from med journals to 'teach' my doctor as to why I'm on a certain medication. As I read various studies I can see some clinical trials were not conducted properly. I used to work at a large university school of medicine where all residents had to conduct a Human Use study through the NIH approval. I saw those studies from original abstract to completion and publication. If I can see the discrepancies in the published trials, why can't the doctors reading the journal? They just don't think anymore.